cover research and practices associated with quality improvement and supported employment program management. We sent the draft surveys to a panel of program managers for their reviews. This panel of program managers included the vice president of the ENL and four local program managers who represented rural and urban areas. We made subsequent revisions to the survey based on suggestions from the panel. We excluded the panel members from the actual survey.The final questionnaire contained three sections. The first section consisted of six questions asking demographic information about the supported employment program. Specifically, questions pertained to supported employment approaches offered by the program, structure of the program, funding sources for the program, years of services since the program has been approved as a vendor, preferred educational qualifications when hiring new employees, and preferred work experiences when hiring new employees.The second section presented nine questions designed to capture demographic information about the respondent. The questions included exact job title, age, gender, years of experiences as a supported employment program manager, percentage of job spent in supported employment program management activities, direct service experiences, satisfaction with current job, and highest educational level.The third section consisted of one question and a scale. The question asked respondents to identify their preferred training formats by checking, from a list of eight choices, those training formats that they preferred to attend. The eight choices were &dquo;1-2 hour presentations&dquo;, &dquo;I-day presenta-tions&dquo;, &dquo;2-day workshops&dquo;, &dquo;on-site technical assistance&dquo;, &dquo;teleconferences&dquo;, &dquo;certificate programs&dquo;, &dquo;degree programs&dquo;, and &dquo;other (please specify) &dquo;. The scale presented a list of 33 potential training topics. Respondents were asked to indicate the extent to which they believed they needed training on each of 33 topics on a series of 5-point ordinal scales (See Figure 1). The 33 topics were classified into three categories of information: General supported employment information (9 topics), program development information (12 topics), and program management information (12 topics).We conducted analyses of internal consistency reliability for the third section of the survey using data from the current study. We obtained a reliability coefficient of .94 for the section. The reliability coefficients for each