2015
DOI: 10.1111/ajad.12271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profile of internet access in active cocaine users

Abstract: Background and Objectives Web-based interventions have received attention for substance abuse treatment. Few studies have examined Internet use among substance users. Methods Internet-use data were examined for 66 participants screened to participate in behavioral pharmacology studies. Results A majority of active cocaine users reported regular Internet use. Demographic profiles generally did not impact Internet use, but Internet users were more likely to be younger and report other drug use. Discussion … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be a particular concern for future studies in substanceusing populations that may be more transient and have unreliable Internet sources. Digital divides are still evident in access to the Internet and other technology, however, some research in substance-using populations does suggest that some of these divides may be closing (e.g., Cunningham, Selby, Kypri, & Humphreys, 2006;McClure, Acquavita, Harding, & Stitzer, 2013;Strickland, Wagner, Stoops, & Rush, 2015). A majority of participants also reported completing the baseline survey on a computer (93.2%) and a smaller percentage on a phone (4.0%) or tablet (2.9%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be a particular concern for future studies in substanceusing populations that may be more transient and have unreliable Internet sources. Digital divides are still evident in access to the Internet and other technology, however, some research in substance-using populations does suggest that some of these divides may be closing (e.g., Cunningham, Selby, Kypri, & Humphreys, 2006;McClure, Acquavita, Harding, & Stitzer, 2013;Strickland, Wagner, Stoops, & Rush, 2015). A majority of participants also reported completing the baseline survey on a computer (93.2%) and a smaller percentage on a phone (4.0%) or tablet (2.9%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…balance sample diversity with generalization to the clinical condition (e.g., one third of individuals in the present study did not report behaviors indicative of a cocaine use disorder, perhaps limiting the impact of regulation of craving strategies for "nonproblematic" cocaine users). These factors, combined with the rising rates of Internet use among clinical and nonclinical populations, makes online crowdsourcing research a promising source for future pilot and basic laboratory research (Fox & Rainie, 2014;McClure, Acquavita, Harding, & Stitzer, 2013;Strickland, Wagner, Stoops, & Rush, 2015). Demonstrating craving regulation in active cocaine users provides converging evidence for the validity of ROC tasks as a model of CBT craving skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This exclusion would prove problematic for individuals with intermittent access to the Internet or difficulty in using e-banking reimbursement methods. Although some digital divides still exist, other work has also demonstrated increasing Internet and smartphone access, including among persons with current or past illicit substance use (e.g., McClure, Acquavita, Harding, & Stitzer, 2013;Strickland, Wagner, Stoops, & Rush, 2015;Tofighi, Abrantes, & Stein, 2018). The online setting also does not allow for direct contact with participants removing a possibility for clarification or direct follow-up questions.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%