2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2018.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profile repeatability: A new method for evaluating repeatability of individual hormone response profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the moderate repeatability of hormone levels, this sampling effort is likely to yield imprecise estimates of individual consistency (47). It would also be valuable for endocrinologists to have a discussion of the best approach for evaluating individual consistency, as there are a variety of different approaches, including several recent suggestions [e.g., reaction norm approach (40) and profile repeatability (34)]. Finally, to improve our understanding of consistent individual variation in endocrinology, it is critical that repeatability studies recognize the pleiotropic nature of hormones so that repeated measurements assess the same biological function of a hormone.…”
Section: R107mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the moderate repeatability of hormone levels, this sampling effort is likely to yield imprecise estimates of individual consistency (47). It would also be valuable for endocrinologists to have a discussion of the best approach for evaluating individual consistency, as there are a variety of different approaches, including several recent suggestions [e.g., reaction norm approach (40) and profile repeatability (34)]. Finally, to improve our understanding of consistent individual variation in endocrinology, it is critical that repeatability studies recognize the pleiotropic nature of hormones so that repeated measurements assess the same biological function of a hormone.…”
Section: R107mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…negative feedback strength) are emerging as having greater value than single time point measurements (e.g. maximum titres) in predicting fitness [9], while establishing within-individual repeatability between acute stress responses is essential for determining response phenotypes [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, given recent interest in estimating the repeatability of glucocorticoid regulation ( Cockrem, 2013 ; Hau et al, 2016 ; Taff, Schoenle & Vitousek, 2018 ), I also included a function that takes input from cort_sim2 and calculates the observed repeatability of several measures using package rptR ( Stoffel, Nakagawa & Schielzeth, 2017 ). Full details are included in the package documentation, but this function returns repeatability for each individual time point specified in the down sampled data set, profile repeatability ( Reed, Harris & Romero, 2019 ), and repeatability for area under the curve (AUC) calculated as both increase (AUC I ) and ground (AUC G ) approaches ( Pruessner et al, 2003 ). For each AUC measure, the function returns repeatability for the full time course, for an estimate using only the observed values in the down sampled data set, and for the full data set constrained to the time period encompassing the observed data points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%