2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0265-931x(03)00174-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiles of doses to the population living in the high background radiation areas in Kerala, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the HBRA, indoor ambient gamma dose rate is higher than the outdoor dose rate, and it distributes widely between 260 and 600 nGy h -1 [2]. Different from the HBRAs such as Kerala, India, where external exposure is dominant [3], Yangjiang is characterized by dominant internal exposure. It was reported that average annual effective dose to residents in HBRAs of Yangjiang was estimated to be 6.4 mSv with doses of 2.1 and 4.3 mSv for the external and internal exposure, respectively [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the HBRA, indoor ambient gamma dose rate is higher than the outdoor dose rate, and it distributes widely between 260 and 600 nGy h -1 [2]. Different from the HBRAs such as Kerala, India, where external exposure is dominant [3], Yangjiang is characterized by dominant internal exposure. It was reported that average annual effective dose to residents in HBRAs of Yangjiang was estimated to be 6.4 mSv with doses of 2.1 and 4.3 mSv for the external and internal exposure, respectively [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of the total radiation dose to the world population have shown that a fraction of about 96 % is from natural sources, while 4 % is from artificial ones (Chougaonkar et al 2003). External gamma dose contributions are predominantly from the presence of 40 K and of 232 Th and 238 U and their progeny in various rocks and soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimation of total radiation dose to the world population has shown that about 96% is from natural sources while 4% is from artificial sources [1]. Globally, not much attention was given to public exposure to radon gas ( 222 Rn) until the 1980s when dangerous radon ( 222 Rn) levels were reported inside homes and schools in the United States of America [2].…”
Section: Radon (mentioning
confidence: 99%