1976
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(76)90235-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiles of reproductive hormones associated with fertile and nonfertile inseminations of dairy cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
2
3

Year Published

1980
1980
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
46
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Serum progester¬ one concentrations in these females (2-58 ±0-51 ng/ml) were comparable to those in females ( (Moore, 1975) and with asynchronous transfer (Lawson, 1977) show that subtle differences in the hormonal milieu can have profound effects on embryonic development. The progesterone levels in pregnant and non-pregnant cows on Days 9-14 closely resemble those reported by Shemesh et al (1968) and Pope et al (1969) (Henricks et al, 1971;Erb et al, 1976) and Day 13 after oestrus (Holness et al, 1977). The values given by Henricks et al (1971) for pregnant cows were substantially higher than those in the pregnant heifers at Days 10-12 in the present study, and those reported by Erb et al (1976) for non-pregnant animals were substantially lower than those in the present study.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Serum progester¬ one concentrations in these females (2-58 ±0-51 ng/ml) were comparable to those in females ( (Moore, 1975) and with asynchronous transfer (Lawson, 1977) show that subtle differences in the hormonal milieu can have profound effects on embryonic development. The progesterone levels in pregnant and non-pregnant cows on Days 9-14 closely resemble those reported by Shemesh et al (1968) and Pope et al (1969) (Henricks et al, 1971;Erb et al, 1976) and Day 13 after oestrus (Holness et al, 1977). The values given by Henricks et al (1971) for pregnant cows were substantially higher than those in the pregnant heifers at Days 10-12 in the present study, and those reported by Erb et al (1976) for non-pregnant animals were substantially lower than those in the present study.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…A number of investigators, including Shemesh, Ayalon & Lindner (1968), Pope, Gupta & Munro (1969), Henricks, Dickey & Niswender (1970), Wettemann & Hafs (1973), Erb, Garverick, Randel, Brown & Callahan (1976) and Holness, Ellison & Wilkins (1977) have reported systemic levels of progesterone during early pregnancy in the cow. These reports are about evenly divided on whether pregnant cows have higher levels of progesterone in blood than do non-pregnant cows 6-14 days after insemination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been clearly shown in numerous studies using timed AI programs (Souza et al, 2007;Brusveen et al, 2008;Bisinotto et al, 2010b;Giordano et al, 2012b and. In addition, studies on cows that receive AI after detection of estrus, have generally reported that minor elevations in P4 near AI are also detrimental to fertility (De Silva et al, 1981;Waldmann et al, 2001;Ghanem et al, 2006), although some studies did not obtain this result (Erb et al, 1976;Plym Forshell et al, 1991). During Ovsynch, the percentage of cows that do not have complete regression following the PGF2α treatment before timed AI has been reported to range from 5% to 30% (Moreira et al, 2000;Gumen et al, 2003;Souza et al, 2007;Brusveen et al, 2009;Martins et al, 2011b;Giordano et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Pregnancy Loss In Dairy Cowsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The key role of greater P4 before AI on fertility of lactating dairy cows was recognized in early studies that compared fertile to non-fertile inseminations (Folman et al, 1973;Erb et al, 1976;Meisterling and Dailey, 1987). In addition, concentrations of P4 12 days before first AI had a positive relationship with conception rate at first AI in lactating Holstein and Jersey dairy cattle (Fonseca et al, 1983).…”
Section: Fertility In Dairy Cowsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, pregnancy rate was 13% higher in heifers treated with split than with full dose. The relatively lower fertility rate in treated than in control heifers could be due to either altered timing of the preovulatory LH surge or could result from asynchronies in endocrine events around oestrus and ovulation (Erb et al, 1976;Godfrey et al, 1989). However, the endocrine basis of reduced fertility after induced oestrus in zebu cattle in Africa needs further studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%