2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10585-012-9474-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiling immunohistochemical expression of NOTCH1–3, JAGGED1, cMET, and phospho-MAPK in 100 carcinomas of unknown primary

Abstract: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous entity, managed on the basis of "one size fits all" therapeutic concepts; insights into the molecular biology of CUP are urgently needed. We retrospectively examined the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of Notch1, 2, 3, Jagged1, cMET, and pMAPK biomolecules in 100 CUP tumors using tissue microarrays, aiming to study their correlation to clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic utility for patient outcome. Notch3 and pMAPK were most frequently expre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the role of MET in the progression of CUPs, we also evaluated the status of MET in the primary tumor [35, 36]. Analysis of MET revealed no evidence of amplification or other gene alterations (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the role of MET in the progression of CUPs, we also evaluated the status of MET in the primary tumor [35, 36]. Analysis of MET revealed no evidence of amplification or other gene alterations (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, PDCs with neuroendocrine features and gastrointestinal PDCs have shown hyperactivation of the AKT/mTOR pathway [7882]. Additionally, given the role of MET in the progression of CUPs and the availability of MET-inhibitors in the clinic [35, 36], we evaluated MET status in both the primary patient tumor and PDX tumor models, but found no evidence of genetic or expression abnormalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immunostained results of Notch-1 protein were semi-quantitated according to the criteria from published literatures [2,11]. Each section randomly selected 5 high-power fields, positive cells represented by the percentage of totally number of similar cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immunohistochemistrical antibodies were listed as follows: CD10 (56C6, Dako), Bcl6 (M7211, Dako), MUM1 (MUM1p, Dako), Ki67 (MB1, Dako), P50 (sc-8414, Santa Cruz), P65 (#4764, Cell Signaling) and Notch2 (ab52302, Abcam). For Ki67 [26] and Notch2 [27] , cases were considered to be positive when 25% or 20% of lymphoma cells were stained, respectively. For the rest antibodies, we defined 30% as the cut-off [28] , [29] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%