2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232012188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiling Substrate Specificity of the SUMO Protease Ulp1 by the YESS–PSSC System to Advance the Conserved Mechanism for Substrate Cleavage

Abstract: SUMO modification is a vital post-translational regulation process in eukaryotes, in which the SUMO protease is responsible for the maturation of the SUMO precursor and the deconjugation of the SUMO protein from modified proteins by accurately cleaving behind the C-terminal Gly–Gly motif. To promote the understanding of the high specificity of the SUMO protease against the SUMO protein as well as to clarify whether the conserved Gly–Gly motif is strictly required for the processing of the SUMO precursor, we sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, based on our structural analysis, it can be noticed how peptides with higher cleavage rates have better electrostatic complementarities with the binding groove, especially because of the presence of the negatively charged residues in positions P7–P8, which have been previously linked with substrate specificity [ 24 ], and which interacts with an electropositive patch formed by basic residues, such as R124, R172, and R196 ( Figure S14, Supplementary Materials ). Consequently, it is possible to hypothesize that the faster cleavage rates of AGA sequences compared to AGS [ 41 ] may not be related to the P1′ residue, coherently with the tolerated variability in P2–P1′ residues across substrate sequences within the CE clan [ 42 ], yet might be instead related to ancillary residues located before and after the proteolytic cut site, which confer an increased affinity towards the binding groove.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, based on our structural analysis, it can be noticed how peptides with higher cleavage rates have better electrostatic complementarities with the binding groove, especially because of the presence of the negatively charged residues in positions P7–P8, which have been previously linked with substrate specificity [ 24 ], and which interacts with an electropositive patch formed by basic residues, such as R124, R172, and R196 ( Figure S14, Supplementary Materials ). Consequently, it is possible to hypothesize that the faster cleavage rates of AGA sequences compared to AGS [ 41 ] may not be related to the P1′ residue, coherently with the tolerated variability in P2–P1′ residues across substrate sequences within the CE clan [ 42 ], yet might be instead related to ancillary residues located before and after the proteolytic cut site, which confer an increased affinity towards the binding groove.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first [12] is focused on the role of legumain in the regulation of biological processes and in the pathogenesis of various malignant and nonmalignant diseases, including cancer, bone remodeling, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, fibrosis, aging and senescence, and neurodegenerative diseases. The second [13] describes SUMO modification as one of post-translational regulation processes in eukaryotes. In this process, SUMO protease is responsible for the maturation of the SUMO precursor and the deconjugation of the SUMO protein from modified proteins by cleaving behind the C-terminal Gly-Gly motif.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%