2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10711-016-0209-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profinite rigidity for Seifert fibre spaces

Abstract: An interesting question is whether two 3-manifolds can be distinguished by computing and comparing their collections of finite covers; more precisely, by the profinite completions of their fundamental groups. In this paper, we solve this question completely for closed orientable Seifert fibre spaces. In particular, all Seifert fibre spaces are distinguished from each other by their profinite completions apart from some previously-known examples due to Hempel. We also characterize when bounded Seifert fibre spa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of Theorem B, the next step in addressing Question 0.1 is to consider the pieces of the JSJ decomposition. The Seifert fibred case has been resolved by Wilkes [Wil17b], building on work of Hempel [Hem14]: Seifert fibred -manifolds are not profinitely rigid, but do have finite genus, and Wilkes was able to give a complete description of when two such -manifold groups have isomorphic profinite completions; he was subsequently able to extend this to a complete answer to Question 0.1 for graph manifolds [Wil18a, Theorem 10.9]. In that paper, Sol-manifolds were not included in the class of graph manifolds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of Theorem B, the next step in addressing Question 0.1 is to consider the pieces of the JSJ decomposition. The Seifert fibred case has been resolved by Wilkes [Wil17b], building on work of Hempel [Hem14]: Seifert fibred -manifolds are not profinitely rigid, but do have finite genus, and Wilkes was able to give a complete description of when two such -manifold groups have isomorphic profinite completions; he was subsequently able to extend this to a complete answer to Question 0.1 for graph manifolds [Wil18a, Theorem 10.9]. In that paper, Sol-manifolds were not included in the class of graph manifolds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a canonical injection Aut(π 1 S) ֒→ Aut( π 1 S) and we will abuse notation by identifying an automorphism of φ 1 S with the induced automorphism of the profinite completion. As was noted by Boileau and Friedl [BF15b, Corollary 3.6], Theorem 5.2 of [Wil17] implies that the canonical map Out(π 1 S) → Out( π 1 S)…”
Section: Relation To Mapping Class Groupsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…There is a corresponding notion for non-orientable orbifolds, but this will not be relevant to this paper. [Wil17]). Let M and N be Seifert fibre spaces whose boundary components are ∂M 1 , .…”
Section: Results From Previous Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations