2006
DOI: 10.1002/mana.200510405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profinite Teichmüller theory

Abstract: For 2g – 2 + n > 0, let Γg, n be the Teichmüller group of a compact Riemann surface of genus g with n points removed Sg, n , i.e., the group of homotopy classes of diffeomorphisms of Sg, n which preserve the orientation of Sg, n and a given order of its punctures. There is a natural faithful representation Γg, n → Out(π 1(Sg, n )). For any given finite index subgroup Γλ of Γg, n , the congruence subgroup problem asks whether there exists a finite index characteristic subgroup K of π 1(Sg, n ) such that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given a simplex σ ∈ C(S), let us denote also by σ its image in L( Π C ) and byΓ(S) C σ the correspondingΓ(S) C -stabilizer. From Proposition 6.5 in [3] and Theorem 3.5, it follows thatΓ(S) C σ is the closure of the stabilizer Γ(S) σ (for the action of Γ(S) on C(S)) inΓ(S) C . Since every σ ∈ L( Π C ) is in theΓ(S) C -orbit of some simplex in the image of C(S), this gives a complete description of stabilizers for the action ofΓ(S) C on the pro-C curve complex L( Π C ).…”
Section: The Complex Of Pro-c Curves On Smentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given a simplex σ ∈ C(S), let us denote also by σ its image in L( Π C ) and byΓ(S) C σ the correspondingΓ(S) C -stabilizer. From Proposition 6.5 in [3] and Theorem 3.5, it follows thatΓ(S) C σ is the closure of the stabilizer Γ(S) σ (for the action of Γ(S) on C(S)) inΓ(S) C . Since every σ ∈ L( Π C ) is in theΓ(S) C -orbit of some simplex in the image of C(S), this gives a complete description of stabilizers for the action ofΓ(S) C on the pro-C curve complex L( Π C ).…”
Section: The Complex Of Pro-c Curves On Smentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Indeed, there is a natural Z/2-gerbe H g → M 0,[2g+2] , for g ≥ 2, defined assigning, to a genus g hyperelliptic curve C, the genus zero quotient curve C/ι marked by the branch locus of the finite morphism C → C/ι, where ι, as usual, denotes the hyperelliptic involution. Similarly, in the genus 1 case, there is a Z/2-gerbe M 1,1 → M 0,1 [3] , where, by the notation "1 [3]", we mean that one label is distinguished from the others (which instead are unordered). For 2g − 2 + n > 0, there is also a natural representable morphism H g,n+1 → H g,n , forgetting the (n + 1)-th marked point, which is isomorphic to the universal n-punctured curve over H g,n .…”
Section: -Congruence Subgroup Properties For Hyperelliptic Mapping mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a more complete treatment of level structures and Teichmüller theory, we refer the reader, for instance, to Section 1 of Boggi [4]. Let S M g;n , for 2g 2 C n > 0, be the stack of n-pointed, genus g , stable algebraic curves over C .…”
Section: Level Structures Over Moduli Of Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let M g;n be the real oriented blow-up of M g;n along the divisor M g;n X M g;n (more details on this construction can be found in Section 3 of Boggi [4]). There is a natural embedding M g;n ,!…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%