2013
DOI: 10.17811/ebl.2.4.2013.190-205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profit and cost efficiency in the Italian banking industry (2006-2011)

Abstract: This study evaluates the cost and the profit efficiency of Italian banking sector over the period 2006-2011. Translog stochastic frontiers are used for this purpose. Following the intermediation approach, efficiency scores are computed from estimating a model with three inputs and three outputs. Results show that the average levels of cost and profit efficiency are both around 90% and they are quite stable over time. However, there is high heterogeneity in results. Differences have been found when banks are cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency levels are higher in small Banks than in major ones, but minor, medium, and large Banks achieve cost efficiency levels higher than the small ones. 3 These results are quite interesting and sometimes surprising such as the one that smaller banks are more efficient than bigger banks (Aiello & Bonanno, 2013;Bonanno, 2014), but for our aim the most Source: Own elaboration on ABI data. Significance levels: ***= 0.001; **= 0.01; *= 0.05. sigma 2 = σ 2 u + σ 2 v ; this is composed of the error variance, given by the sum of the variances of the two components.…”
Section: First Stage: Results From Sfamentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The efficiency levels are higher in small Banks than in major ones, but minor, medium, and large Banks achieve cost efficiency levels higher than the small ones. 3 These results are quite interesting and sometimes surprising such as the one that smaller banks are more efficient than bigger banks (Aiello & Bonanno, 2013;Bonanno, 2014), but for our aim the most Source: Own elaboration on ABI data. Significance levels: ***= 0.001; **= 0.01; *= 0.05. sigma 2 = σ 2 u + σ 2 v ; this is composed of the error variance, given by the sum of the variances of the two components.…”
Section: First Stage: Results From Sfamentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These results are quite interesting and sometimes surprising such as the one that smaller banks are more efficient than bigger banks (Aiello & Bonanno, ; Bonanno, ), but for our aim the most important issue is the following one. We obtain that the erratic component u it , the share of the composite error that measures inefficiency, has been “cleaned up” from some sources of inefficiency (bad loans, solvency, etc.…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis will be informed by the theory of efficiency using the Stochastic Frontier profit framework (SFPF). The stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) is a stochastic method because it allows individuals to be distant from the frontier and for randomness (Aigner et al 1977;Meeusen and van de Broek 1997;Aiello and Bonanno 2013;Djomo 2019). It differs from the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), which supposes that distance from the frontier is entirely due to inefficiency.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding aligns with (Ab-Rahim et. el., 2012) but contradicts Aiello & Bonanno (2013). Although the proxy for credit risk is not relevant to cost efficiency, it will be prudent for banks to pay attention to it to avoid plausible negative impact on cost efficiency (Xiang, Shamsuddin, & Worthington, 2015).…”
Section: Determinants Of Cost Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%