2020
DOI: 10.56454/aadz1939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profit-Maximizing Planting Date and Seeding Rate for Upland Cotton in the Upper Mid-South

Abstract: The objective of this research was to determine the profit-maximizing planting date and seeding rate for cotton production in the upper Mid-South. We used field trial data from Tennessee, Missouri, and Mississippi from 2016 to 2018 to estimate a cotton lint yield response function to planting date and planting population. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to compare the results for different cotton lint and seed prices. Additionally, we explored how optimal seeding rates change with late planting. We found … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may suggest that the economic benefits associated with different P levels are not solely driven by yield but by other factors not explicitly measured here ( van de Wiel et al., 2016 ; Mai et al., 2018 ). Studies conducted by other researchers demonstrate how the market prices of cotton impact planting decisions on optimal planting dates to maximize profits ( Singh et al., 2017 ; Boyer et al., 2020 ; Sankaranarayanan et al., 2020 ). Sankaranarayanan et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may suggest that the economic benefits associated with different P levels are not solely driven by yield but by other factors not explicitly measured here ( van de Wiel et al., 2016 ; Mai et al., 2018 ). Studies conducted by other researchers demonstrate how the market prices of cotton impact planting decisions on optimal planting dates to maximize profits ( Singh et al., 2017 ; Boyer et al., 2020 ; Sankaranarayanan et al., 2020 ). Sankaranarayanan et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%