Summary:Our study analyzes the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells after two chemotherapeutic regimens in nonHodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients. The study included 72 patients with NHL (42 follicular and 30 large cells). The mean age was 37 years (range 17-60). Sixty-four patients (88.9%) had stage III-IV disease. Forty-eight patients (66.7%) had bone marrow involvement. Systemic B symptoms were present in 42 patients (58.3%). Mobilization chemotherapy regimens were randomly assigned as DHAP in 38 patients (52.7%) or cyclophosphamide (CPM) (5 g/m 2 ) in 34 (47.2%) and the results of 132 procedures were analyzed. At the time of PBSC mobilization, 46 patients (63.9%) were considered to be responsive (complete remission, partial remission or sensitive relapse) and 26 (36.1%) not responsive (refractory relapse or refractory to therapy). Pre-apheresis CD34 + blood cell count and number of previous chemotherapy treatments were used to predict the total number of CD34 + cells in the apheresis product. The mobilizing regimens (CPM or DHAP) were similar in achieving the threshold CD34 + cell yield, for optimal engraftment. Since DHAP was very effective as salvage treatment, we suggest using DHAP as a mobilizing regimen in patients with active residual lymphoma at the time of stem cell collection. ( toxicity. [5][6][7][8] In the literature, high-dose cyclophosphamide (CPM) seems to be the gold standard for mobilizing hematopoietic progenitor cells in lymphoproliferative disorders. 9,10 Single high doses of alkylating agents (high-dose CPM or melphalan) have been used as mobilizing chemotherapy in NHL and other malignancies. [9][10][11][12] Combination chemotherapy regimens such as DHAP or MAD or ESHAP have also been used for stem cell harvesting. [13][14][15] In a previous study the DHAP protocol has already shown real efficacy in debulking and in vivo purging in refractory or in partial remission NHL. 16,17 The DHAP regimen was thus integrated into various treatment plans tailored for NHL patients as a second-line therapy and salvage chemotherapy for PR patients, or as an intensification and mobilizing regimen in CR high risk patients. 16,17 In our previous experience, we used the DHAP protocol as salvage treatment in patients in PR or with refractory NHL. Few randomised studies report a comparison of mobilizing capacity of two different chemotherapeutic regimens such as ESHAP or ifosfamide vs CPM in lymphoproliferative disorders. [18][19][20] In our study 72 NHL patients undergoing PBSC transplantation were prospectively randomized to mobilize PBSC with the DHAP regimen or with high-dose CPM in order to evaluate whether there were any differences in the number of mononuclear cells harvested (× 10 8 /kg), CD34 + cells (×10 6 /kg), colony-forming units granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) (×10 4 /kg) obtained or engraftment speed.
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Patients and methodsThe following parameters were examined in the two different mobilized groups: (1) Clinical: (i) type of mobilizing regimen (DHAP (cisplatin 100 mg/...