2001
DOI: 10.1006/frne.2001.0210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progesterone Receptors as Neuroendocrine Integrators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
3
51
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is widely accepted that PR activation is an obligatory step for E 2 -increased pituitary response to LHRH (Chappell et al 1999) and LHRH self-priming (Turgeon & Waring 1994). These and other (Turgeon & Waring 1990, 1991 observations explicitly demonstrate that the presence of the neuroendocrine integrator PR (Levine et al 2001) is an absolute requirement for the transmission of E 2 -induced signals leading to LH surge. Accumulated evidence indicates that gonadotroph PR can be activated by the cognate ligand (Rao & Mahesh 1986) and, in a ligand-independent manner (Blaustein 2004), by LHRH intracellular signalling pathways (Turgeon & Waring 1994, Fink 1995.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Thus, it is widely accepted that PR activation is an obligatory step for E 2 -increased pituitary response to LHRH (Chappell et al 1999) and LHRH self-priming (Turgeon & Waring 1994). These and other (Turgeon & Waring 1990, 1991 observations explicitly demonstrate that the presence of the neuroendocrine integrator PR (Levine et al 2001) is an absolute requirement for the transmission of E 2 -induced signals leading to LH surge. Accumulated evidence indicates that gonadotroph PR can be activated by the cognate ligand (Rao & Mahesh 1986) and, in a ligand-independent manner (Blaustein 2004), by LHRH intracellular signalling pathways (Turgeon & Waring 1994, Fink 1995.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Such observations are provocative. They contrast with the reported phenotype of Pgr mutant mice (19,20,29,30), insights gained from hormone replacement experiments (13,32), and the reported neuroendocrine actions of progesterone receptor antagonists (25)(26)(27)(28) and demand a rethinking of the hormonal control of reproductive cyclicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…One possibility is that estrogen alters neurochemical secretion by the SCN or the signaling efficacy of these chemicals via second messenger systems and kinases Levine, 1997). An alternative hypothesis is that estrogen stimulates ligand-independent progesterone receptor production, and the timed neuronal signal acts on progesterone receptors Levine, 1997;Levine et al, 2001). This scheme suggests that the effects of estrogen are integrated with the SCN signal at the level of progesterone receptors to ensure that the GnRH system is sensitive to the daily signal only during the preovulatory estrogen surge.…”
Section: Neural Scn Output and Estrus Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%