SUMMARY:We have delineated regions of interest at chromosome 2q21.2, 2q36.3, and 2q37.1 by deletion mapping of 114 urothelial cancers (UC). Altogether, 17%, 18%, and 63% of the G1, G2, and G3 tumors displayed loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 2q, respectively, The region at 2q21.2 was narrowed down to the LRP1B gene (NT_005129.6). Hemi-and homozygous deletion at the LRP1B gene region was seen in 31 of 114 UCs. Only 8% of the UCs with G1 and none with G2 tumors showed loss of heterozygosity at the LRP1B gene, whereas 49% of the G3 UCs had allelic loss at this region. RT-PCR analysis of the LRP1B gene showed the lack of expression of several exons in 2 of 9 cases analyzed. Our analysis suggests that the LRP1B gene is a candidate tumor suppressor gene in UCs. (Lab Invest 2002, 82:639 -643).C ancer of the urinary bladder is one of the most common tumors in the Western world. The majority of urothelial cancers (UC) are diagnosed as noninvasive tumors (Ta), whereas 20% to 25% of the cases show an invasive growth (T1-4) at the time of first presentation. From the clinical point of view, the question arises whether these two major groups of tumors are distinct entities or correspond to different stages of progression of a single tumor entity. Pioneering cytogenetic analyses before the chromosome banding era have suggested that the number of gross karyotype alterations predicts the clinical course of UCs, for example, recurrency and progression (Falor and Ward, 1978;Lamb, 1967). Later, several studies showed that allelic changes at specific chromosomal regions and alterations of tumor suppressor genes, such as PTEN, RB, and TP53, correlate with stage and grade of bladder cancers (for review see Knowles, 1999). Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) studies also suggested quantitative differences of genetic changes, including DNA losses at chromosome 2q22-33, 2q32-qter, and 2q34-qter regions, between the noninvasive and invasive bladder cancers (Richter et al, 1997Simon et al, 1998Simon et al, , 2000. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at chromosome 2q is also associated with aggressive growth of head and neck and non-small cell lung carcinomas (Ransom et al, 1998;Shiseki et al, 1994). Recently, Liu et al (2000) identified a putative tumor suppressor gene LRP1B from the chromosome 2q21.2 region that was found to be homozygously deleted in several cancer cell lines, including the bladder cancer cell line VM-CUB-2. To delineate putative tumor suppressor gene regions, we analyzed 114 UCs for 20 microsatellite loci at the chromosome 2q including those from the LRP1B region. We identified three distinct regions of LOH in 40% of tumors and found a correlation between LOH at chromosome 2q and tumor grade.
Results
Three Target Regions of Allelic Loss at Chromosome 2qCGH analysis of 18 Grade 3 (G3) UCs of this series revealed a gain at chromosome 2p in 7 cases and loss of DNA at chromosome 2q in 11 cases (one example is shown in Fig. 2). Therefore, we evaluated score 2 at chromosome 2p as a duplication of one allele, but at chromoso...