1984
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-82031-1_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognosis of Breast Cancer Related to Intramammary Lymph Nodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
29
1
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
29
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors have reported diverse identification rates of iMLNs ranging from 0.2 to 48% [3,5,10,11,12,13,14]. This variability was caused by the use of different detection methods, including autopsy, pathologic review and retrospective chart review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have reported diverse identification rates of iMLNs ranging from 0.2 to 48% [3,5,10,11,12,13,14]. This variability was caused by the use of different detection methods, including autopsy, pathologic review and retrospective chart review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por outro lado, a prevalência desse achado na anatomia patológica é de 1 a 28% 7, 15 . As poucas séries de casos relatando o linfonodo IM são provenientes de bancos de dados de serviços com casuística superior a 3.600 pacientes, alcançadas num período superior a cinco anos [8][9][10][11]14,16 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Em publicações baseadas em bancos de dados, a ocorrência do linfonodo IM varia de 0,6 14 a 2% 8,11 e a ocorrência do LS-IM na ordem de 0,2 10 a 2,6% 13 . Por outro lado, a prevalência desse achado na anatomia patológica é de 1 a 28% 7,15 . As poucas séries de casos relatando o linfonodo IM são provenientes de bancos de dados de serviços com casuística superior a 3.600 pacientes, alcançadas num período superior a cinco anos [8][9][10][11]14,16 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified