For years we have been interested in the problems of nephritis in childhood. In the follow-up study of nephritic children the presence of continued hematuria is, among other data, of great significance. We were therefore interested in comparing several methods of detecting the presence and degree of hematuria in the patients we have seen recently.The ordinary routine microscopic examination of the urinary sediment has the one great advantage of simplicity. The finding of red blood cells in a freshly voided specimen of urine is a valuable observation, as it is usually a definite indication of a pathologic condition in the genitourinary tract. The absence of red cells in a chance specimen needs a different interpretation. Alkaline urine quickly destroys red blood cells. Examination of a dilute specimen will often be negative for red blood cells unless sufficient time is allowed for sedimentation or the specimen is centrifuged.In some clinics an attempt is made to determine quantitatively the number of formed elements in a specimen of urine by reporting their number per high power or per low power field. This practice, however, generally gives only an illusion of quantitative accuracy, as the result will depend on many factors : the total amount of urine in the specimen ; the time allowed for sedimentation or centrifugation ; the acidity of the urine ; the size and depth of the drop looked at and the technic of obtain¬ ing the drop. It is well nigh impossible to keep all these factors con¬ stant all the time.A quantitative method of studying urinary sediment was introduced in 1926 by Addis.1 The principal purpose of this method was to elimi¬ nate the difficulties mentioned and to give comparable quantitative results. An acid, concentrated twelve hour specimen is collected. The formed elements are counted in a counting chamber. The results are reported