2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.06.277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Association Supports Indexing Size Measures in Echocardiography by Body Surface Area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) guidelines [ 1 ] recommend that biplane LA volume (LAV), measured from the apical 4 and 2ch views, be indexed to body surface area (BSA). Prior studies have demonstrated that indexing cardiac chamber and aortic size improves prognostic performance [ 2 ]. However, recently BSA has been questioned as the best indexation parameter [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) guidelines [ 1 ] recommend that biplane LA volume (LAV), measured from the apical 4 and 2ch views, be indexed to body surface area (BSA). Prior studies have demonstrated that indexing cardiac chamber and aortic size improves prognostic performance [ 2 ]. However, recently BSA has been questioned as the best indexation parameter [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further dosimetry work by Madder et al in a 1119-patient cohort [ 6 ] underscored the relationship between BMI and patient radiation dose but also showed that high patient BMI resulted in increased physician radiation dose [ 6 ]. However, alternative measures of patients, such as BSA, have not been examined to this extent in the setting of cardiac catheterisation, despite their established discriminative power in other fields of cardiology, such as echocardiography [ 10 ] and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [ 11 ]. Thus, our study aims to evaluate different anthropometric measures in addition to other patient and procedural characteristics and their association with radiation dose and patient radiation exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%