2001
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.54.7.543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic comparative study of S-phase fraction and Ki-67 index in breast carcinoma

Abstract: Aims-To investigate the prognostic value of recently proposed flow cytometric S-phase fraction (SPF) variables (average SPF and SPF tertiles) compared with conventional SPF, and to compare the one with the best predictive value with the immunohistochemical Ki-67 index in breast carcinoma. Methods-A short term follow up study (median, 39.6 months) of a large series of patients (n = 306) was conducted. DNA ploidy was analysed on fresh/frozen tumour samples by flow cytometry, and the SPF was calculated from the D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
26
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have reported that SPF is the most important predictor of survival in breast cancer (2,9,10,16,17). In the studies performed at the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon, besides the prognostic significance of SPF in the subgroup of axillary node-positive patients (7), a comparison between SPF and Ki-67 expression for assessing tumour proliferative activity (25) revealed that only SPF had statistical significance for predicting disease outcome. Ki-67 expression analysis has the technical advantage of allowing the morphological evaluation of proliferating cell populations; however, there is still an important unresolved issue concerning the identification of the optimal Ki-67 cut-off value for discriminating between tumours with low and high proliferation (44,45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Numerous studies have reported that SPF is the most important predictor of survival in breast cancer (2,9,10,16,17). In the studies performed at the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon, besides the prognostic significance of SPF in the subgroup of axillary node-positive patients (7), a comparison between SPF and Ki-67 expression for assessing tumour proliferative activity (25) revealed that only SPF had statistical significance for predicting disease outcome. Ki-67 expression analysis has the technical advantage of allowing the morphological evaluation of proliferating cell populations; however, there is still an important unresolved issue concerning the identification of the optimal Ki-67 cut-off value for discriminating between tumours with low and high proliferation (44,45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPF is a continuous biological variable rather than a dichotomous function; thus, each laboratory should establish its own SPF data (18). The current study used a median SPF value of 6.1% as the cut-off point to distinguish between tumours with low and high proliferative activity, as when distinct SPF variables were previously investigated, this cut-off value provided the highest prognostic significance (25). As recommended by previous studies (18)(19)(20), another approach to reporting SPF is the subdivision into tertiles (<4.5, 4.5-9.2 and ≥9.2%), which has been proven to possess prognostic significance (25).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations