2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic efficacy of preoperative mGPS, SIS and LCS in patients with gastric cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of 810 unique articles screened, 18 were assessed by their full texts. We excluded 11 studies not fulfilling the inclusion criteria and managed to include seven studies in this review (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Out of 810 unique articles screened, 18 were assessed by their full texts. We excluded 11 studies not fulfilling the inclusion criteria and managed to include seven studies in this review (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another novel marker that has been used in recent years is the SIS. The SIS combines albumin and LMR values and has been noted to be superior to other blood-borne markers like the NLR, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, and lymphocyte C-reactive protein score for patients with cancer ( 18 , 28 ). Its prognostic ability has also been validated in several cancer subtypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Chen et al found that the lymphocyte CRP level is a useful tool for predicting postoperative mortality in patients with GC. 12 Pang et al reported that a preoperative inflammation-based score could precisely predict LNM in patients with GC. 13 Liu et al developed a nomogram based on CRP/album with a high predictive LNM power in patients with GC with cN0 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of systemic inflammatory markers and nutritional markers to predict prognosis and progression of disease has been widely used and proved to be useful, and the representatives include Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), CONUT, and NPS ( 16 , 21 , 50 ). Other different combinations of two kinds of markers are also determined to have effective prognostic ability in tumors ( 51 , 52 ). Some of these prognostic scores like GPS and CONUT are also researched in patients with GBM, and the results are consistent with those of previous studies ( 25 , 53 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%