2017
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.04.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors after pulmonary metastasectomy of colorectal cancers: a single-center experience

Abstract: Bilateralism and primary tumor local extension influence the prognosis of patients surgically treated for pulmonary colorectal metastases. Specifically designed randomized trials are necessary.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies had mostly focused on the patients undergoing resection of the lung metastases and patients who did not receive lung metastasectomy were excluded. Although the clinical factors analyzed in each study were different, the roles of some predictors had been confirmed in many studies [9][10][11][12], including: the distribution and size of lung metastases, the status of pulmonary lymph nodes, the CEA level of lung lesions before surgery, and the existence of liver metastases, etc. [10,11,[13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous studies had mostly focused on the patients undergoing resection of the lung metastases and patients who did not receive lung metastasectomy were excluded. Although the clinical factors analyzed in each study were different, the roles of some predictors had been confirmed in many studies [9][10][11][12], including: the distribution and size of lung metastases, the status of pulmonary lymph nodes, the CEA level of lung lesions before surgery, and the existence of liver metastases, etc. [10,11,[13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As we reported in previous paragraphs, multidisciplinary evaluation is fundamental, especially in the case of multi-organ involvement. In particular, patients with a history of extra-thoracic metastases[ 61 , 68 - 70 ] had a worse prognosis similar to patients with synchronous or bilateral lung involvement[ 71 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to long-term outcome, 5-year OS after single metastasis resection ranged between 32% and 62%[ 61 , 71 , 77 ], but it is interesting to note that the best survival rates (around 60% at 5 years) were reported in recent studies[ 61 , 71 ] suggesting a progressive improvement in terms of therapeutic strategies, but also regarding more accurate patient selection. The presence of a single metastases was one of the most important prognostic factors in surgically treated patients (Table 1 ), which was also confirmed in a meta-analysis by Gonzalez et al [ 78 ], who demonstrated a favorable prognostic role for the number of resected metastases, which was a significant favorable factor associated with CEA levels, DFI, and presence of lymph node involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulmonary metastasectomy is considered part of the treatment in these patients and has become recommended in many types of tumors. Thus, it has been shown that there is an increase in overall survival and disease-free survival times [ 2 ]. On the other hand, presence of mediastinal or hilar lymph node metastasis is also important in terms of prognosis especially in tumors of epithelial origin [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%