2003
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2003.06.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes in Children and Adolescents With Metastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma—A Report From the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study IV

Abstract: Children with group IV RMS treated on the IRS-IV study had improved OS and FFS if they had two or fewer metastatic sites and embryonal histology. This favorable subset of patients has outcomes approaching those observed in selected patients with localized, nonmetastatic disease. Thus, these patients might not be appropriate candidates for regimens that include experimental agents with substantial toxicities or unproven antitumor activity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
318
4
16

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 429 publications
(353 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
318
4
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Sharing the same classification would allow easier comparison between clinical presentation and behavior in adults and children. Finally, specific chemotherapy for A‐RMS and E‐RMS is an independent prognostic value in our study and others 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47. North American and European pediatric groups have identified several risk factors (favorable location, IRSG stage, IRSG group, and age) to define the clinical group and deliver a regimen adapted to the risk group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sharing the same classification would allow easier comparison between clinical presentation and behavior in adults and children. Finally, specific chemotherapy for A‐RMS and E‐RMS is an independent prognostic value in our study and others 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47. North American and European pediatric groups have identified several risk factors (favorable location, IRSG stage, IRSG group, and age) to define the clinical group and deliver a regimen adapted to the risk group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Clinical presentation is also less favorable. All retrospective studies note more aggressive disease with more unfavorable sites 1, 36, 37, 38, 39, more LN, more metastasis 9, 36, 40, 41, and more A‐RMS. Nevertheless, all parameters being equal, the outcome of adult patients with RMS is less favorable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, the prognosis was worse for patients with metastatic disease than for patients with localised disease. The 5‐year overall survival rate for metastatic disease (48 ± 8%) was better than corresponding previously published results 7, 21, 22.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…All tumors were obtained from patients enrolled on the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group IV protocol [25][26][27] or later studies. Cases were selected on the basis of submission by the treating institution of a paraffin block or formalinfixed tissue for banking at The Biopathology Center.…”
Section: Paraffin-embedded Rhabdomyosarcoma Tumors and Tissue Microarmentioning
confidence: 99%