2020
DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors and outcomes of nonseminomatous germ cell tumours of testis—experience from a tertiary cancer centre in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IGCCCG poor risk group was identified as a poor risk factor in previous studies including a study from India [ 13 ] which reflects the burden of disease and similarly, in our series S3 marker emerged as a poor prognostic factor for OS. Another study from India [ 14 ] reported non-pulmonary visceral metastasis as a poor prognostic factor for outcome similar to our finding ( Figure 2c ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…IGCCCG poor risk group was identified as a poor risk factor in previous studies including a study from India [ 13 ] which reflects the burden of disease and similarly, in our series S3 marker emerged as a poor prognostic factor for OS. Another study from India [ 14 ] reported non-pulmonary visceral metastasis as a poor prognostic factor for outcome similar to our finding ( Figure 2c ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Well established data are available from developed countries with mature outcome data. Apart from two with large amounts of data [ 13 , 14 ], there are only a few published reports available from India on NSGCT [ 8 – 12 ]. Those are also limited by improper risk stratification or treatment details and minimal outcome data ( Table 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our literature review, we identified only six other institutes in the country that published their experience in India. [ 2-6 32 ] Of these, only one study projected an estimated RFS at 5 years after a 33-month median follow-up period after open pcRPLND. [ 5 ] Another study published their experience with 37 patients after robot-assisted pcRPLND with a median follow-up of 41 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%