1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3858-1_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Factors for Malignant Glioma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the explanations for this association are the rela tive surgical accessibility of the cortical tumors, earlier detection and diagnosis as a result of early seizure activity and also the higher frequency of low-grade tumor types in this population [34,36]. In our series, cortical involve ment of tumor in general was not significantly associated with long survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Among the explanations for this association are the rela tive surgical accessibility of the cortical tumors, earlier detection and diagnosis as a result of early seizure activity and also the higher frequency of low-grade tumor types in this population [34,36]. In our series, cortical involve ment of tumor in general was not significantly associated with long survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…From our data it is also apparent that within the tested groups (A + B), fewer parietal tumours are sensitive in vitro (Table II), and this results in an overall poorer prognosis for patients with parietal tumours in the group as a whole. A detailed examination of the Brain Tumor Study Group data has failed to confirm that patients with parietal tumours have a worse prognosis than patients with tumours in other locations (Byar et al, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The malignant glioma carries an extremely poor prognosis particularly in the older patients and in patients with a poor performance status and the standard 6 week course of post-operative radiotherapy is disproportionately long, given their poor prognosis for survival [11][12][13]. There is therefore a need to improve the survival-treatment time ratio by decreasing the standard treatment time and also a need to find a way to select out those patients who will benefit from radiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%