2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors for patients with accidental hypothermia: A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We described the patients and hospital characteristics as follows: sex age, season (Spring: March-June; Summer: July-August; Autumn: September-November; and Winter: December-February), and regions of Japan (Northern, Eastern, Western, and Southern). The season and area were de ned by the de nition of the Japan Meteorological Agency (details of the area are described in the supplementary materials) [18]. In addition, we described pre-hospital and in-hospital patient data as follows: bystander witness, bystander CPR, shockable on initial rhythm, advanced airway inserted by paramedics, cardiac rhythm on hospital arrival [return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), shockable, pulseless electrical activity (PEA), asystole], core BT on arrival, and ECMO implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We described the patients and hospital characteristics as follows: sex age, season (Spring: March-June; Summer: July-August; Autumn: September-November; and Winter: December-February), and regions of Japan (Northern, Eastern, Western, and Southern). The season and area were de ned by the de nition of the Japan Meteorological Agency (details of the area are described in the supplementary materials) [18]. In addition, we described pre-hospital and in-hospital patient data as follows: bystander witness, bystander CPR, shockable on initial rhythm, advanced airway inserted by paramedics, cardiac rhythm on hospital arrival [return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), shockable, pulseless electrical activity (PEA), asystole], core BT on arrival, and ECMO implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies that have investigated predictors for mortality in urban patients with hypothermia, poor outcome was associated with shock, need for vasoactive drugs, 14 high BUN value, low platelet count, 2 indoor occurrence, 2,15 age 75 years old or older, need for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), hemodynamic instability, and hyperkalemia. 5 Danzl et al 9 advocated a hypothermia outcome score consisting of five parameters: BUN value, systolic blood pressure, with or without prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation, need for tracheal intubation, and nasogastric tube placement. Elbaz et al 7 also suggested five parameters as risk factors for in-hospital death in patients with hypothermia in an urban setting in a desert climate: age ≥70 years, mean arterial pressure <90 mmHg, pH < 7.35, creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL, and confusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies regarding accidental hypothermia have been undertaken in alpine settings, and few studies have been carried out in urban settings. Previous studies have reported that accidental hypothermia in urban settings is associated with a high mortality rate (12%, 26%, 29%, and 47%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This multicenter retrospective study aimed to clarify the relationship between the level of consciousness and core BT and to determine whether the level of consciousness could be used to predict severe hypothermia and in-hospital mortality among patients with AH. We used data from the J-point registry database [2,8], which has been previously described [2,[8][9][10]. Brie y, the registry includes information regarding patients with BT unknown or ≤35°C who were treated for AH in emergency departments between April 1, 2011 and March 31, 2016.…”
Section: Study Design and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The JCS is widely accepted by paramedics and nurses working in the emergency department and is correlated with the GCS [14]. Therefore, when GCS data were missing, we imputed values for mildly impaired consciousness (JCS level 1, 1-3), moderately impaired consciousness (JCS level 2, 10-30), and severely impaired consciousness (JCS level 3, 100-300) based on previous reports [8,9]. sex, ADL, consciousness, systolic blood pressure, and heart rate.…”
Section: Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%