2014
DOI: 10.1071/rd12368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors for successful varicocelectomy to treat varicocele-associated male infertility

Abstract: The present study identified prognostic factors for successful varicocelectomy for the treatment of varicocele-induced male infertility. All varicoceles were diagnosed and graded by physical examination and ultrasound. Pre- and postoperative analysis of semen specimens measured sperm density, morphology and motility. 'Responder' and 'non-responder' status was determined by semen analyses at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Varicocele Grades 1, 2 and 3 were found in 16, 36 and 28 patients, respectively; 49 p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…found that preoperative sperm density had a favorable association with the likelihood of successful (as determined by improvements in semen analysis at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively) varicocelectomy, and that a preoperative sperm density of 12 × 10 6 ml −1 or greater was able to predict successful varicocelectomy with a sensitivity of 77.6% and specificity of 77.4%. 7 To our review, there have been no studies demonstrating a negative correlation between pre- and post-repair sperm density.…”
Section: Prevaricocelectomy Factors Predicting Postrepair Semen Parammentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…found that preoperative sperm density had a favorable association with the likelihood of successful (as determined by improvements in semen analysis at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively) varicocelectomy, and that a preoperative sperm density of 12 × 10 6 ml −1 or greater was able to predict successful varicocelectomy with a sensitivity of 77.6% and specificity of 77.4%. 7 To our review, there have been no studies demonstrating a negative correlation between pre- and post-repair sperm density.…”
Section: Prevaricocelectomy Factors Predicting Postrepair Semen Parammentioning
confidence: 89%
“…found on multivariate logistic regression that age, with an odds ratio of 0.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.41–0.76), had a significant unfavorable association with the likelihood of improvement in semen analysis parameters after varicocelectomy. 7 Conversely, a study of men with nonobstructive azoospermia found that patient age at the time of repair was not associated with the odds of recovery of sperm in the ejaculate following the varicocelectomy. 21 Likewise, several other studies have not demonstrated a relationship between age and seminal outcomes following varicocele repair.…”
Section: Prevaricocelectomy Factors Predicting Postrepair Semen Parammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the data indicated that low preoperative standard semen parameters were predictive of better outcomes than high baseline parameters after varicocoele correction. Multiple studies have confirmed the authors’ data (Marks et al ., ; Matkov et al ., ; Huang et al ., ; Samplaski et al ., ). In fact, the larger and the greater the influence of the mechanisms affecting spermatogenesis and fertility potential, the worse the sperm parameters were (Samplaski et al ., ; Marmar, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Huang et al found that preoperative sperm density had a favorable association with the likelihood of successful varicocelectomy, and that a preoperative sperm density of 12 × 106 /ml or greater was able to predict successful varicocelectomy with a sensitivity of 77.6% and specificity of 77.4%. 17 Authors compared pre-operative and post-operative semen parameters with respect to age of patients. Mean sperm counts/ml (million/ml) improved from 43, 52.96 and 44.05 (pre-operatively) to 65.5, 68.42 and 73.72 (post-operatively) among age groups <20 years, 21-30 years and 31-40 years respectively as shown in table III.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%