2008
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-07-100958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors in childhood anaplastic large cell lymphoma: results of a large European intergroup study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
116
1
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
116
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative prognostic impact of high LDH levels was previously suggested by the French study LMB-89 [7,13]. Our findings would support that observation but, possibly due to the relatively small cohort of patients, none of the common prognostic parameters analyzed showed an impact on prognosis, including CNS involvement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The negative prognostic impact of high LDH levels was previously suggested by the French study LMB-89 [7,13]. Our findings would support that observation but, possibly due to the relatively small cohort of patients, none of the common prognostic parameters analyzed showed an impact on prognosis, including CNS involvement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…MDD at diagnosis is frequently detected in pediatric ALCL and can identify patients at risk of relapse [5]. The most common clinical features of ALCL in the pediatric population include systemic symptoms, especially high fever, generalized lymph-adenopathy and involvement of extranodal sites such as skin, bone, soft tissue, lung, and liver [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The central nervous system (CNS) is rarely involved [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In children, 18-25% of systemic ALCLs develop skin manifestations during the course of the disease and this is a poor prognostic factor. [4][5][6][7][8][9] Systemic ALK-negative (ALK -) ALCL is included in the updated WHO classification as a separate preliminary entity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 Clinical risk factors have been defined and used for therapy stratification. 8,9 Minimal disseminated disease, as detected by polymerase chain reaction analysis for NPM-ALK in blood or bone marrow, serum antibody titers against ALK and the morphological subtype are strong predictors of clinical outcome. [10][11][12][13][14] The main morphological subtypes are: (i) the common type, which is composed of large tumor cells with pleomorphic nuclei; (ii) the small cell variant with ALK proteinexpressing tumor cells that do not differ in size from reactive T-cells; (iii) the lymphohistiocytic variant with abundant histiocytes admixed with the lymphoma cells which are as small as in the small cell variant; and (iv) other rare subtypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%