1983
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1983.01040010919013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Factors in Corneoscleral Lacerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
59
3
16

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
59
3
16
Order By: Relevance
“…6,12,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] (2) Delay in wound closure of 424 hFthere is a fourfold increase in the infection rate when there was a delay of 424 h. 6 (3) Injury in a rural settingFthe incidence of endophthalmitis was reported to be higher when penetrating injury occurred in a rural setting, which was attributed to a higher incidence of soil contamination.…”
Section: Incidence and Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,12,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] (2) Delay in wound closure of 424 hFthere is a fourfold increase in the infection rate when there was a delay of 424 h. 6 (3) Injury in a rural settingFthe incidence of endophthalmitis was reported to be higher when penetrating injury occurred in a rural setting, which was attributed to a higher incidence of soil contamination.…”
Section: Incidence and Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…5,14 The reported incidence rate of endophthalmitis following open-globe injury ranges from 0 to 16.5% (Table 1), with evidence of a general decline over the past 70 years. 4,6,12,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Prophylactic factors in the setting of trauma include primary wound repair within 24 h, lack of tissue prolapse into wounds and self-sealing wounds. 20 In a report from the American Trauma Registry, the incidence of endophthalmitis did not significantly differ among various types of foreign bodies.…”
Section: Incidence and Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…1 The incidence rates of ocular trauma requiring hospitalisation are reported to be 8.1 per 100 000 persons per year in Scotland, 2 12.6 per 100 000 persons per year in Singapore, 3 13.2 per 100 000 persons per year in the United States, 4 and 15.2 per 100 000 persons per year in Australia. 5 Several studies have suggested that the factors that significantly predict visual outcome after open globe injuries are initial visual acuity, 6,7 presence of a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD), 7,8 mechanism of injury, 7,9,10 wound location, 7,11,12 adnexal trauma, 8,13 lens damage, 7,12 hyphaema, 14 vitreous haemorrhage, 11,15 and retinal detachment. 11,16 In 2002, Kuhn et al 17 developed a prognostic model, the ocular trauma score (OTS), to predict the visual outcome of patients after ocular trauma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Most studies have shown no significant difference in final visual outcome for repairing emergently versus postponing for a reasonable amount of time so that appropriate operating room personel or medical clearence can be obtained. Barr showed that a delay in repair of up to 36 hours does not impact postoperative visual acuity [6] contrary to Cruvinal-Isaac et al who proposed that a delay in surgical repair may be associated with the reduced vision [5]. It is important to discuss the relative risks so that informed decisions can be made regarding the best timing for surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 39%