2001
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2001.19.2.525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Factors in Localized Primary Synovial Sarcoma: A Multicenter Study of 128 Adult Patients

Abstract: These data confirm that not all SS present the same severe outcome. High-risk patients identified on the basis of these parameters may qualify for an aggressive treatment approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

25
215
5
9

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
25
215
5
9
Order By: Relevance
“…During the last several decades, much effort has been invested in determining prognostic factors affecting overall survival in patients with synovial sarcoma. Histologic subtype, tumor grade, anatomic location, age, gender, tumor size, and surgical margins have been reported to have prognostic implication for a patient's overall survival [1,2,6,9,12,16,17,[19][20][21][22][23][24]. In our study, histologic subtype, grade, anatomic location, size, age, and surgical margins did not predict overall survival.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During the last several decades, much effort has been invested in determining prognostic factors affecting overall survival in patients with synovial sarcoma. Histologic subtype, tumor grade, anatomic location, age, gender, tumor size, and surgical margins have been reported to have prognostic implication for a patient's overall survival [1,2,6,9,12,16,17,[19][20][21][22][23][24]. In our study, histologic subtype, grade, anatomic location, size, age, and surgical margins did not predict overall survival.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…There are approximately 800 new cases of synovial sarcoma per year in the United States [26]. Historically, synovial sarcoma has been associated with poor prognosis, with survival at 5 years ranging from 55% to 76% [2,16,20,21,23,27]. However, with advances in molecular biology and classification, it has emerged all synovial sarcomas do not share the same tumor biology when it comes to local recurrence, metastasis, and survival [2,16,17,[19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed that frequent mitosis, sex (male), visceral location, and large tumor size were poor prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. High mitotic activity 16,17 and large tumor size [16][17][18][19] were consistently reported as adverse prognostic factors for SS. To our knowledge, the prognostic implications of visceral locations have not been assessed; however, truncal/proximal tumors reportedly confer a worse prognoses than tumors of the distal extremities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference in survival according to sex also was observed in previous large studies. 17,20 Takenaka et al Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival curves illustrate overall survival according to the results from immunohistochemical studies of (A) phosphorylated Akt (pAkt), (B) phosphorylated mammalian target of rapamycin (pmTOR), (C) phosphorylated eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein (p4E-BP1), and (D) phosphorylated S6 ribosomal protein (pS6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%