2004
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.01.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Factors in Resected Stage I Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Multivariate Analysis of Six Molecular Markers

Abstract: In this cohort of resected stage I NSCLC patients, molecular markers that independently predict cancer-specific survival have been identified. The prognostic roles of DAPK methylation, IL-10, and other biomarkers in NSCLC merit further investigation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
96
0
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
96
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In lung cancers, DAPk promoter methylation was associated with aggressive disease and poor survival. [35][36][37][38] Lung tumors that were positive for DAPk hypermethylation showed advanced pathological stage, larger tumor size and lymph node involvement. 35 Similarly, DAPk hypermethylation in head and neck cancer correlated with lymph node involvement and advanced disease stage.…”
Section: Dapk Family and Cancer: A Novel Tumor Suppressor Family Of Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In lung cancers, DAPk promoter methylation was associated with aggressive disease and poor survival. [35][36][37][38] Lung tumors that were positive for DAPk hypermethylation showed advanced pathological stage, larger tumor size and lymph node involvement. 35 Similarly, DAPk hypermethylation in head and neck cancer correlated with lymph node involvement and advanced disease stage.…”
Section: Dapk Family and Cancer: A Novel Tumor Suppressor Family Of Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable evidence of elevated COX-2 levels in NSCLC, and this is of importance in lung carcinogenesis [9][10][11]. It was published that higher levels of COX-2 are more related to ADC than to SCC [12][13][14][15], and over-expression of COX-2 has been proposed as a biomarker for biologically aggressive types of NSCLC and poorer survival [16][17][18]. The correlation between the higher expression of COX-2 and hTERT in NSCLC was already discussed and proposed as a prognostic marker [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was published that higher levels of COX-2 are more related to ADC than to SCC [12][13][14][15], and over-expression of COX-2 has been proposed as a biomarker for biologically aggressive types of NSCLC and poorer survival [16][17][18]. The correlation between the higher expression of COX-2 and hTERT in NSCLC was already discussed and proposed as a prognostic marker [18]. The MDM2 oncogene, mostly over-expressed in NSCLC, is the main negative regulator of p53 [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found one significant interaction between COX-2 and stage (Po0.01). When we aggregated the six studies (Achiwa et al, 1999;Khuri et al, 2001;Araki et al, 2004;Lu et al, 2004;Richardson et al, 2005;Yuan et al, 2005) giving separate results about stage I NSCLC, the combined HR was statistically significant by using the random-effect model: HR 1.64, 95% CI (1.21 -2.24) as there was indeed a significant heterogeneity (P ¼ 0.04) (Figure 2). We did not observe a statistically significant effect of COX-2 on survival in ADC (five evaluable studies) (Achiwa et al, 1999;Araki et al, 2004;Yamaguchi et al, 2004;Richardson et al, 2005;Yuan et al, 2005) with HR 1.35 (95% CI 0.62 -2.95) (random effect; test of heterogeneity Po0.001).…”
Section: Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fourteen publications, published between 1999 and 2005, were eligible for the systematic review (Achiwa et al, 1999;Hosomi et al, 2000;Khuri et al, 2001;Brabender et al, 2002;Kim et al, 2003;Ab' Saber et al, 2004;Araki et al, 2004;Lu et al, 2004;Yamaguchi et al, 2004;Brattstrom et al, 2005;Laga et al, 2005;Marrogi et al, 2005;Richardson et al, 2005;Yuan et al, 2005). These publications concerned different cohorts of patients.…”
Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%