2018
DOI: 10.2995/jacsurg.32.556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors in surgically resected pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 7 - 10) In addition, the 5-year DFS was reported as 33.6%–63.3%. 9 - 11) Our results are similar to those of past reports but less than those reported recently.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 7 - 10) In addition, the 5-year DFS was reported as 33.6%–63.3%. 9 - 11) Our results are similar to those of past reports but less than those reported recently.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…and pathological findings (pathological stage, lymph node metastasis, tumor size, etc.). 6 - 11) In this study, DFI within 1 year was detected as a poor prognostic factor for OS, and the N2 pathological status and presence of adenocarcinoma components were identified as poor prognostic factors for DFS. We could not identify significant differences in the survival curves for tumor size, stage, and v-factor that were previously reported to have poor prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and pathological findings (pathological stage, lymph node metastasis, tumor size, etc.) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. However, the prognostic factors for stage IV PPC are not clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%