2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for patients with delayed encephalopathy after acute carbon monoxide poisoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, its pathogenesis remains undetermined. Therefore, there is no definitive treatment modality against etiology, and the present clinical treatment is primarily symptomatic [13][14][15] . In this study, the incidence of DEACMP was estimated to be 21.68% during follow-up, and most patients presented symptoms after a pseudo-healing period of 2-52 days following acute poisoning, which is essentially consistent with the results of a prior study 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its pathogenesis remains undetermined. Therefore, there is no definitive treatment modality against etiology, and the present clinical treatment is primarily symptomatic [13][14][15] . In this study, the incidence of DEACMP was estimated to be 21.68% during follow-up, and most patients presented symptoms after a pseudo-healing period of 2-52 days following acute poisoning, which is essentially consistent with the results of a prior study 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DEACMP patients suffer a series of neurological and psychiatric disorders, including cognitive dysfunction, motor impairment, extrapyramidal systems dysfunction, even consciousness disturbance after a brief lucid period, cortical blindness, depression. DEACMP may be caused by secondary brain tissue damage, due to CO-mediated brain tissue hypoxia, oxygen-based free radicals, and membrane peroxidation, instead of due to direct hypoxia-induced damage [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%