Background/Aim: The optimal extent of lymph node dissection for ampullary carcinoma is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of lymph node dissection for ampullary carcinoma. Patients and Methods: Between 2000 and 2020, a total of 75 patients undergoing radical resection for ampullary carcinoma were included. The efficacy index (EI) was calculated by multiplication of the frequency of lymph node metastasis (LNM) at the station and the 5-year survival rate of patients with metastasis at the station. Results: Out of 75 patients, 14 had LNM. The EI for the peri-pancreatic head (station 13 and 17) and superior mesenteric artery (station 14) lymph node were 4.4 and 3.5, respectively. Whereas the peri-gastric (station 5 and 6), common hepatic artery (station 8), and liver hilum (station 12) lymph node stations had zero EI. Although the number of patients with the station 16 dissected was small (9%), the para-aortic (station 16) lymph nodes had the highest EI of 14.3 despite being distant lymph nodes. Conclusion: We identified the distribution of LNM and survival benefit of lymph node dissection for ampullary carcinoma. Our results suggest that the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for ampullary carcinoma could be reconsidered.Ampullary carcinoma of the duodenum, or carcinoma of the papilla of Vater, is a rare malignant neoplasm arising from the region of Vater's ampulla. Radical resection with pancreatoduodenectomy is the standard treatment for ampullary carcinoma (1); however, the significance of the optimal lymph node dissection on outcomes remains unclear. Although the Japanese guideline for ampullary carcinoma has proposed the optimal extent of lymph node dissection (2), the impact of the lymph node station dissected on the prognostic survival benefit is still unknown (3). Furthermore, data on long-term outcomes such as survival and recurrence patterns are limited (4, 5).The efficacy index (EI) has been proposed as a useful index to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer (6), and validated for various gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary cancers (7-9). However, to date, the impact of lymph node dissection on outcomes using the EI has not yet been examined in patients following radical resection for ampullary carcinoma.The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lymph node dissection using the EI as well as to determine the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for ampullary carcinoma. Moreover, long-term outcomes including survival and recurrence patterns were investigated.
Patients and MethodsPatients and study design. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee at our institution (approval no. 2110-003) and conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. We performed a retrospective review of the clinical database including 75 patients who underwent radical resection with pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma at the