2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic heterogeneity in T3aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma according to the site of invasion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“… 18 confirmed these results by analyzing 419 patients treated for pT3a stage RCC; poorer survival rates were observed in patients with EFI + RVI compared to patients with either pathology alone. Our results indicate a significant difference in RFS among groups A (single pathology) and B (both pathologies), however we did not observe a significant difference among the CSS of the two groups The difference between our study and previous studies is that we excluded patients who had lymph node invasion (LNI) 10 , 16 . The previous study showed that patients who had EFI and RVI had higher rates of LNI.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 18 confirmed these results by analyzing 419 patients treated for pT3a stage RCC; poorer survival rates were observed in patients with EFI + RVI compared to patients with either pathology alone. Our results indicate a significant difference in RFS among groups A (single pathology) and B (both pathologies), however we did not observe a significant difference among the CSS of the two groups The difference between our study and previous studies is that we excluded patients who had lymph node invasion (LNI) 10 , 16 . The previous study showed that patients who had EFI and RVI had higher rates of LNI.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…According to the current TNM staging system, EFI and RVI can each lead to inclusion in same stage – (T3a) regardless of whether one or both of these pathologies (EFI or RVI) are present. However, several previous studies have shown that patients with EFI and RVI had poorer outcomes than those with only one (EFI or RVI) 10 , 16 18 . A recent European multi-center study 17 , validated the latest edition of the TNM (2009), evaluating 503 cases of T3a stage RCC and noting significantly lower survival rates in patients with concomitant EFI and RVI vs those with the single pathologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the current TNM staging system, the classification of pT3a only includes tumors extending into the renal vein or its branches; microscopic wall involvement is not mentioned in this particular category. Notably, Park et al (18) found that pT3aN0M0 patients who presented with RVI had a significantly worse prognosis than those with fat invasion; the 5-year recurrence-free survival and 5-year DSS for RVI/RVI+PFI±PSI vs. PFI alone/PSI alone/PFI+PSI were 33.8 vs. 67.9% (p < 0.001) and 63.0 vs. 88.2% (p < 0.001), respectively. However, it is important to note that in the RVI/RVI+PFI±PSI group, 52.1% of patients presented with vein-wall invasion and that renal vein-wall involvement was a good predictor of a poor prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multivariable* HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) Progression, P < 0.001 Progression, P = 0.020 In contrast to our present results, several studies report prognostic differences between various sites of extrarenal extension. Particularly notable is a recent study by Park et al [8] who, despite reporting worse survival outcomes for combined RV and perirenal fat infiltration, also note increased CSM in the setting of isolated RV tumour thrombus vs isolated perirenal fat involvement. This discrepancy with our present study findings may be explained by their inclusion of a substantial number of cases with microscopic tumour invasion of the RV wall.…”
Section: Univariablementioning
confidence: 99%