2010
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.2285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Impact of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Enzyme Isoforms 1 and 2 Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Study by the Acute Leukemia French Association Group

Abstract: Contrarily to what is reported in gliomas, IDH1m and IDH2m in AML are associated with a poor prognosis. Screening of IDH1m could help to identify high-risk patients within the subset of CN-AML with a favorable genotype.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
140
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
19
140
2
Order By: Relevance
“…7,15,17 More perplexingly, IDH2 R172 mutation alone was found to have distinct gene-and microRNA-expression profiles, 9 and appeared to be an independent poor prognostic factor. 18 In contrary, results from two studies suggested a possible favorable impact of IDH2 mutation in subgroups of AML patients. 7,8 Overall, the prognostic implication of IDH2 mutation is still controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,15,17 More perplexingly, IDH2 R172 mutation alone was found to have distinct gene-and microRNA-expression profiles, 9 and appeared to be an independent poor prognostic factor. 18 In contrary, results from two studies suggested a possible favorable impact of IDH2 mutation in subgroups of AML patients. 7,8 Overall, the prognostic implication of IDH2 mutation is still controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…7,[13][14][15][16][17] However, different features between IDH1-mutated and IDH2-mutated AML were shown in several reports, and even there existed differences between IDH2 R140 and R172 mutations. 9,17,18 In addition, the prognostic implications of these mutations also varied widely among different institutions. 7,15,17 More perplexingly, IDH2 R172 mutation alone was found to have distinct gene-and microRNA-expression profiles, 9 and appeared to be an independent poor prognostic factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations in NPM1, IDH1, and IDH2 were not detected in these patients either, a finding that is consistent with data reported in other studies. 4,[27][28][29][30] The virtual exclusion of mutations in these four genes in patients with a favorable-risk profile is not random and may reflect the leukemogenic properties of the fusion proteins created by these chromosomal rearrangements. The PML-RARA fusion protein, which is created by t(15;17), physically interacts with DNMT3A, and AML-ETO, which is created by t(8;21), interacts with DNMT1; both fusion proteins alter the methylation of specific promoters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were processed using Genetic Analysis System Software (Beckman Coulter). Other gene mutations, that is, mutations of FLT3 tyrosine kinase domain (FLT3-TKD; FLT3D835/I836), 36 NPM1, 37 CEBPA, 38 WT1 (exons 7 and 9), 39 IDH1R132, 40 IDH2R172, 40 and IDH2R140, 41 were assessed centrally as previously described.…”
Section: Analysis Of Other Gene Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%