2010
DOI: 10.1002/hed.21390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic implication of sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous head and neck melanoma

Abstract: The SLN status is an important predictor of survival. The technique, performed in the head and neck is complex and associated with a high false-negative rate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
71
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
71
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients who previously underwent a lymph node dissection were now selected to undergo a staging procedure associated with less morbidity. Sentinel lymph node biopsies in head and neck melanomas, however, have a false-negative rate of 30% given the complexity of the lymphatic drainage patterns [19], and subsequent management decisions in these cases are based on inaccurate staging results with the potential to negatively affect patient outcomes like disease-free survival, overall survival, and even brain metastasis-free survival. Changes in the standard of care for primary melanoma patients may therefore have confounded our evaluation of the head/neck site as a risk factor for melanoma brain metastasis development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who previously underwent a lymph node dissection were now selected to undergo a staging procedure associated with less morbidity. Sentinel lymph node biopsies in head and neck melanomas, however, have a false-negative rate of 30% given the complexity of the lymphatic drainage patterns [19], and subsequent management decisions in these cases are based on inaccurate staging results with the potential to negatively affect patient outcomes like disease-free survival, overall survival, and even brain metastasis-free survival. Changes in the standard of care for primary melanoma patients may therefore have confounded our evaluation of the head/neck site as a risk factor for melanoma brain metastasis development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Melanoma of the head and neck was observed to recur within the shortest time interval (9.5-19 months following SLNBx) [10,12]. Risk factors associated with recurrence of melanoma following a negative SLNBx included increased depth of the primary lesion, the presence of ulceration, advanced age at diagnosis and location of the primary lesion on the head and neck [13,14].…”
Section: Recurrence After Negative Slnbxmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The radioactive dye's migration to the SLN is traced with imaging (lymphoscintigraphy) and detected with an intraoperative gamma probe; this technique results in a 95% identification rate, whereas the technique combining use of both dyes demonstrates a 99% localization rate. The probability of developing distant or local disease recurrence following a negative SLN is largely dependent of the tumor depth and biology and can range from 4 to 29% [9,10].…”
Section: Current Role Of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 A higher false negative rate for SLNB in HNM also has been reported in several studies. 16-18 Therefore, the prognostic information from performing SLNB may not be as valuable for HNM as in other body sites, and the relative benefit to patients of undergoing the surgical procedure should be carefully evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%