1991
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910401)67:7<1903::aid-cncr2820670715>3.0.co;2-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic indices for tumor relapse and tumor mortality in follicular thyroid carcinoma

Abstract: To establish an objective basis for therapeutic decisions and follow-up programs in patients with follicular thyroid cancer, the authors developed a prognostic scoring system. The prognostic impact of nine clinical, histologic, and therapeutic parameters was quantified retrospectively based on a multivariate analysis covering 149 patients. The relative relapse risk in follicular thyroid cancer (RR) was 6.8-fold increased in the presence of a moderate when compared with a high degree of histologic tumor differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
2
6

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
36
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In our series, conventional prognostic factors such as poor differentiation, distant metastasis at diagnosis, patient age and large tumor size [1,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] were recognized as having prognostic impact on univariate and/or multivariate analyses, indicating that our series of follicular carcinoma is suitable for statistical analysis. In this study, familial follicular carcinoma showed even better prognosis than sporadic follicular carcinoma, because none of these patients showed recurrence or died of follicular carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our series, conventional prognostic factors such as poor differentiation, distant metastasis at diagnosis, patient age and large tumor size [1,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] were recognized as having prognostic impact on univariate and/or multivariate analyses, indicating that our series of follicular carcinoma is suitable for statistical analysis. In this study, familial follicular carcinoma showed even better prognosis than sporadic follicular carcinoma, because none of these patients showed recurrence or died of follicular carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 summarizes the clinicopathological features of familial and sporadic follicular carcinomas. There were no significant differences in gender, age, carcinoma differentiation, minimally or widely invasive, tumor size, distant metastasis at surgery, massive extrathyroid extension accounting for pT4a in the UICC TNM classification [13], and lymph node metastasis between FNMTC and sporadic follicular carcinoma. Although there was no significant difference, none of FNMTC patients were classified as having poorly differentiated carcinoma and none had distant metastasis at surgery, massive extrathyroid We then compared the prognoses of patients with FNMTC and sporadic follicular carcinoma.…”
Section: Difference In Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis Betmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, several prognostic factors have been identified in Western countries; these include tumor size, distant metastasis at surgery, age, marked vascular invasion, Hurthle cell type, and male gender [94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109]. Ten-year CSS rates ranged from 43 to 80%, which tended to be worse than those of papillary carcinoma possibly because of the higher frequency of distant metastasis.…”
Section: Prognostic Factors For Follicular Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies showed that widely invasive FTC displays a significantly poorer prognosis than minimally invasive FTC [4,5]. To date, other conventional prognostic factors of FTC such as distant metastasis at diagnosis (M1), old age, and large tumor size have also been identified [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. However, prognostic factors of minimally invasive FTC have not been intensively investigated and, to our knowledge, only one manuscript has been published for a large series of patients [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%