2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.651975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Model for Predicting Overall and Cancer-Specific Survival Among Patients With Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A SEER Based Study

Abstract: BackgroundCervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is the most common histological subtype of cervical cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess prognostic factors and establish personalized risk assessment nomograms to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in CSCC patients.MethodsCSCC patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2015 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
3
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, nomograms were developed to calculate the probabilities of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS (based on 13 independent prognostic factors) and CSS (based on 11 independent prognostic factors) in patients with CC. Our nomograms indicated that FIGO stage made the largest contribution to the predicted probability between 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and CSS, which was consistent with a large body of previous research ( 6 , 9 , 25 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, nomograms were developed to calculate the probabilities of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS (based on 13 independent prognostic factors) and CSS (based on 11 independent prognostic factors) in patients with CC. Our nomograms indicated that FIGO stage made the largest contribution to the predicted probability between 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and CSS, which was consistent with a large body of previous research ( 6 , 9 , 25 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…At the end of April 2022, there were two main clinical staging schemes: the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Seventh Edition and the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) 2009 Guidelines. FIGO staging is mainly based on clinical characteristics, but few studies have considered the impact of non-clinical parameters on its clinical utility and net benefit in patients with CC (6)(7)(8)(9). Clinical staging is mainly based on cervical tumor size or extent of pelvic disease, with less weight given to other important prognostic factors such as age, race, and treatment modality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were also studies revealed that preoperative elevated serum CEA level was a risk factor for worse survival 8, 25 . Meanwhile, the present study found the prognosis was strongly associated with age, which was con rmed by other studies in patients with C-MAC who underwent surgical treatment 7,26,5,27 . The potential explanation was that elderly patients were often accompanied by dysfunction, malnutrition, and comorbidity, which limited them to receive aggressive treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The small sample size (n = 43) could have resulted in a type-II error. For example, known poor prognostic factors for cervical cancer, such as older age and locoregional progression (cT), were not significantly correlated with prognosis in the current study [23]. This may be due to the the small sample size of this study as well as the possibility that the prognostic significance of age and locoregional progression in stage IVB is unclear.…”
Section: Plos Onecontrasting
confidence: 63%