2020
DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2020.1729820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Nutritional Index and Clinical Response in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low serum albumin levels were associated with a low nutritional index and predicted a poor prognosis in a cohort of 131 cervical cancer patients treated with RT or CRT [53]. The negative impact of a low nutritional index was further confirmed in a larger and more recent study [54]. Sarcopenia resulting from malnutrition, however, does not affect survival before initiation of treatment, whereas significant loss of skeletal muscle during CRT is associated with an impaired outcome [55][56][57].…”
Section: Hematological Parametersmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Low serum albumin levels were associated with a low nutritional index and predicted a poor prognosis in a cohort of 131 cervical cancer patients treated with RT or CRT [53]. The negative impact of a low nutritional index was further confirmed in a larger and more recent study [54]. Sarcopenia resulting from malnutrition, however, does not affect survival before initiation of treatment, whereas significant loss of skeletal muscle during CRT is associated with an impaired outcome [55][56][57].…”
Section: Hematological Parametersmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Focusing on the host factors, high serum CRP levels, low serum albumin levels, high CAR, high ANC, and high NLR were significant risk factors for poor OS in the univariate analyses (Table 2). In addition to CAR and NLR, several other inflammation‐based markers, such as monocyte‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI), have been regarded as prognostic markers of cervical cancer 31–33 . All of them can reflect systemic inflammation as well as radiation‐induced lymphopenia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to CAR and NLR, several other inflammation-based markers, such as monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI), have been regarded as prognostic markers of cervical cancer. [31][32][33] All of them can reflect systemic inflammation as well as radiation-induced lymphopenia. Therefore, we next evaluated the association between such inflammatory markers and OS after recurrence.…”
Section: Identification Of Prognostic Factors For Recurrent Cervical Cancer Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nutritional and immunological status of patients was reported to be associated with cancer invasion, treatment tolerability, cancer progression and prognosis. 19 21 Previous studies have devised some systems to evaluate nutritional status and/or immune status and demonstrated their efficiency in predicting the prognosis of cancer patients. 19 , 21 – 23 As a recently emerging scoring system of nutritional status, the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score was composed of serum albumin levels, total cholesterol levels, and total peripheral lymphocyte counts 24 and was demonstrated to be a predictive or prognostic factor in malignant tumors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%