2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4201-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic nutritional index as a predictor of survival in resectable gastric cancer patients with normal preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels: a propensity score matching analysis

Abstract: BackgroundAn ideal tumor marker should be capable of being detected at any stage of the disease. However, gastric cancer patients do not always have elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, even in advanced cases. Recently, several studies have investigated the associations between preoperative PNI and postoperative long-term outcomes. In this study, we focused on the significance of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) as a potential predictor of survival in resectable gastric cancer patients w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, GPS or modified GPS based on cancer-related inflammation is an independent predictor of GC survival and can be used as a predictor for patients with GC undergoing platinumbased chemotherapy [30,31]. Moreover, low prognostic nutritional index (PNI), which is calculated from the combination of BMI, lymphocyte count, and albumin, is associated with poor clinical outcome in resectable GC and can act as an independent risk factor [32]. Similarly, controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, which is obtained from total lymphocyte count, total cholesterol level, and albumin, is associated with survival in patients with GC undergoing curative gastrectomy [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, GPS or modified GPS based on cancer-related inflammation is an independent predictor of GC survival and can be used as a predictor for patients with GC undergoing platinumbased chemotherapy [30,31]. Moreover, low prognostic nutritional index (PNI), which is calculated from the combination of BMI, lymphocyte count, and albumin, is associated with poor clinical outcome in resectable GC and can act as an independent risk factor [32]. Similarly, controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, which is obtained from total lymphocyte count, total cholesterol level, and albumin, is associated with survival in patients with GC undergoing curative gastrectomy [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26] However, the related mechanism of action remains largely unknown. 4 Although PLR, NLR, and other hematological markers including nutrition indicators have been established as effective prognostic factors for numerous types of cancers, [8][9][10][11] the relationship between these markers and chemotherapy resistance is also unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peripheral blood inflammation/immuno-nutrition indicators, such as the platelets-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI), are widely recognized as useful prognostic predictors in various malignancies. [8][9][10][11] A low NLR or a high peripheral lymphocyte count could be predictors for a high efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer patients. [12][13][14] To our knowledge, this is the first report to investigate whether a peripheral inflammation/ immuno-nutrition indicator could predict the efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy in gastric cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent studies of long-term results for other organ cancer, significant differences were seen for cutoff values close to or lower than 45; for example, in Hirahara et al and Nozoe et al's studies, the cutoff values were 44.3 for gastric cancer [22] and 40 for colon cancer 40, respectively [8]. Since esophageal cancer has a poor prognosis, a cutoff value slightly higher than 45 would be needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%