2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0748-7983(03)00073-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic predictors of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of 102 patients with definition of a prognostic index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, Bcl-2 would not be useful to predict response to imatinib. Indeed, most of the studies could not associate the highly expressed Bcl-2 to other prognostic factors or to drug response in GIST [22][23][24]34 . We confirmed that Bcl-2 assessment could not improve staging or prognosis assessment in GIST.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Bcl-2 would not be useful to predict response to imatinib. Indeed, most of the studies could not associate the highly expressed Bcl-2 to other prognostic factors or to drug response in GIST [22][23][24]34 . We confirmed that Bcl-2 assessment could not improve staging or prognosis assessment in GIST.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mitotic index has been implicated in the proliferate activities of tumor, and considered as a variable to determine the histological grade of the tumor (van Diest et al 1998) in stomach cancer (Takahashi et al 2003). Kontogianni et al (2003) found that tumor size, necrosis, mitoses, metastasis and PCNA labeling index are correlated as independent poor prognostic factors in GITC. The mitotic activity as an independent prognostic variable is currently used in the tumor-grading system (Medri et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, tumor site (intestines vs stomach), tumor size ( 2 cm), and mitotic index (<5 mitoses per 50 high-powered fields [HPF]) have been shown to be the most significant prognostic indicators. 7,9,[15][16][17]26,28 Cellular proliferation analysis, as determined by Ki67 and argyrophilic nuclear organizer regions (AgNOR) staining, also seem to provide predictive value. 22 No such correlations have been made for canine GISTs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%