2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic risk stratification derived from individual patient level data for men with advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving first-line systemic therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
12
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative prognostic value of visceral disease observed in this study was consistent with a previously published retrospective analysis of 140 patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving first-line systemic therapy, which showed visceral disease had an increased hazard ratio for death of 2.42 (95% CI: 1.47–4.00) (Pond et al, 2014). Also, in a study including 26 patients treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for advanced penile cancer, a trend for a detrimental prognostic effect of visceral disease was reported (HR = 3.35; 95% CI: 0.69–16.21; P = 0.13).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The negative prognostic value of visceral disease observed in this study was consistent with a previously published retrospective analysis of 140 patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving first-line systemic therapy, which showed visceral disease had an increased hazard ratio for death of 2.42 (95% CI: 1.47–4.00) (Pond et al, 2014). Also, in a study including 26 patients treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for advanced penile cancer, a trend for a detrimental prognostic effect of visceral disease was reported (HR = 3.35; 95% CI: 0.69–16.21; P = 0.13).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Prognostic nomograms have been reported in patients with localized disease undergoing surgery (Kattan et al, 2006) and also in patients with metastatic disease receiving first-line systemic treatment (Pond et al, 2014), Unfortunately, there is a lack of such prognostic classifications for patients receiving second or later-line salvage systemic treatment for advanced penile cancer, i.e., locally advanced unresectable or metastatic disease. Prognostic classifications/models may be useful for the interpretation of phase II trial outcomes, especially in the particular case of penile carcinoma, since the rarity of the disease makes it difficult to conduct large, randomized-controlled trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, clinical trials with an objective of seeking signals of biologic and anti-tumor activity when using inhibitors of these pathways require attention. In this context, it is known that cisplatin-based chemotherapy appears to be the most optimal first-line regimen, which accords with the presence of defects in DNA damage repair engendered by BRCA alterations [2]. Additionally PARP inhibitors may warrant evaluation in those with somatic BRCA alterations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with bulky or fixed inguinal lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is also recommended. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with advanced-stage disease compared to non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens [2,11]. Furthermore, taxanes can enhance the efficacy of the regimen [2,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%