2002
DOI: 10.1080/028418602320405023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Significance of Intratumour Microvessel Density and Haemoglobin Level in Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our preliminary experiments showed that brain tumors did not have "hot spots" [sites of vessel concentration, see [26]]. Therefore, the vessels were counted using global approach [26,27].…”
Section: Vessel Density and Area Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our preliminary experiments showed that brain tumors did not have "hot spots" [sites of vessel concentration, see [26]]. Therefore, the vessels were counted using global approach [26,27].…”
Section: Vessel Density and Area Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research is needed to identify more effective prognostic markers for the improvement of the clinical management of cervical carcinoma patients. This would also support the development of novel individually tailored strategies for use in the treatment of high-risk patients due to molecular risk factors (3)(4)(5)(6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although many clinicopathological parameters including clinical or pathological stage of disease, tumor volume or size, lymphatic and metastatic status, and tumor microvessel intensity have been reported to be associated with prognosis, it is still necessary to search so better prognostic markers to improve clinical management of cervical carcinoma patients (Kawagoe et al 1999;Martin-Loeches et al 2002;Gasinska et al 2002). The advent of genomic and proteomic technologies has made it possible to identify novel biomarkers which can predict the presence and prognosis of cancers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%