2014
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2014.111203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic significance of pleural or pericardial effusion and the implication of optimal treatment in primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
36
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance of vena cava syndrome and pleural or pericardial effusion is a specific characteristic of PMBCL 19 that might explain why these factors were not relevant in the report by Evens et al that included less than 50% of patients with a mediastinal presentation. The presence of an altered ECOG-PS was the most important prognostic factor for EFS in our series, as in Evens et al 11 In contrast to other reports, 11,13 disease stage or lymphopenia were not associated with outcome, but anemia was the only factor independently associated with poor OS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The significance of vena cava syndrome and pleural or pericardial effusion is a specific characteristic of PMBCL 19 that might explain why these factors were not relevant in the report by Evens et al that included less than 50% of patients with a mediastinal presentation. The presence of an altered ECOG-PS was the most important prognostic factor for EFS in our series, as in Evens et al 11 In contrast to other reports, 11,13 disease stage or lymphopenia were not associated with outcome, but anemia was the only factor independently associated with poor OS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These results have appeared also in other studies. 12,13,[26][27][28][29] There was one, however, where the outcome in patients treated with R-CHOP was poor. 22 Surprisingly, we observed a trend toward an increased relapse rate after an initial DA-EPOCH-R treatment compared to R-CHOP.…”
Section: Response Assessment and Survival Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HSCT had a better OS (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01-0.84, P = .03) but not PFS (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.06-3.35, P = .43). However, that subgroup of patients was younger (median age26 vs 38, mean age [SD]: 27.1 [6.37] vs 43.6 [18.4] years, P = .012, unpaired t test). comparing these patients (R-CHOP-21 with auto-HSCT) to those treated with DA-EPOCH-R, no differences in their PFS (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.09-1.6, P = .19) or OS (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.03-2.04,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk stratification with IPI in PMBCL is of limited value due to the young age and limited stage of PMBCL at presentation. Aoki et al identified a subgroup of patients with favorable prognostic factors (low IPI and without pleural or pericardial effusion) given R‐CHOP without RT with an excellent 4‐year PFS and OS of 87% and 95%, respectively, compared with those with high IPI and pleural or pericardial effusion (4‐year PFS and OS 54% and 81%, respectively) . These findings require further validation but suggest low‐risk patients may be adequately treated with R‐CHOP alone, while high‐risk patients may require a more intensive approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%