1993
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.87.4.1067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic significance of progression of coronary atherosclerosis.

Abstract: Coronary progression is a strong, independent predictor of future coronary events, particularly cardiac death, and its use as a surrogate end point in clinical trials is justified.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
103
2
10

Year Published

1994
1994
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
9
103
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative risk (95% confidence interval) of subjects with progression compared with those without was 7.3 (2.2 to 24.7, P-c.001) for cardiac death, 2.3 (1.3 to 4.2, />=.009) for cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, 1.4 (1.0 to 2.0, P=.O57) for revascularization, and 1.7 (1.3 to 2.3, P<.001) for any cardiac event. 60 Ten-year follow-up (median, 85.2 months after 2-year angiogram) in CLAS indicates that per-patient assessment of coronary artery lesion progression by both GCS and QCA predicts subsequent cardiac events. Relative risk (95% confidence interval) predicted by GCS for nonfatal myocardial infarction was 1.6 (1.0 to 2.5, P=.Q5) and for nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiac death combined, 1.6 (1.1 to 2.5, F=.O4).…”
Section: Sequential Coronary Angiographic Determination Of Progressiomentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The relative risk (95% confidence interval) of subjects with progression compared with those without was 7.3 (2.2 to 24.7, P-c.001) for cardiac death, 2.3 (1.3 to 4.2, />=.009) for cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, 1.4 (1.0 to 2.0, P=.O57) for revascularization, and 1.7 (1.3 to 2.3, P<.001) for any cardiac event. 60 Ten-year follow-up (median, 85.2 months after 2-year angiogram) in CLAS indicates that per-patient assessment of coronary artery lesion progression by both GCS and QCA predicts subsequent cardiac events. Relative risk (95% confidence interval) predicted by GCS for nonfatal myocardial infarction was 1.6 (1.0 to 2.5, P=.Q5) and for nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiac death combined, 1.6 (1.1 to 2.5, F=.O4).…”
Section: Sequential Coronary Angiographic Determination Of Progressiomentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This could be problematic as the adductor canal region of the SFA has a known predilection for atherosclerosis and is a common site of disease progression (38,39). In the coronary vasculature, even modest changes in plaque progression may be associated with large differences in vascular outcomes (20,21,23). Whether this relationship between plaque progression and vascular events holds true in the periphery remains undetermined.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,8,10 The progression of coronary lesions is a strong predictor of coronary events, especially fatal events, 25 and the rupture of a vulnerable plaque often precedes occlusive coronary thrombosis and death. 26,27 The evidence for an association of ⑀4 with increased progression rate is weak, however, 28 -30 and we are not aware of studies investigating the association of apoE genotype and the occurrence of vulnerable plaques.…”
Section: Possible Reasons Why ⑀4 Specifically Associated With Risk Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%