2001
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010101)91:1<17::aid-cncr3>3.0.co;2-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic significance of the number of bone scan abnormalities at the time of initial bone metastatic recurrence in breast carcinoma

Abstract: BACKGROUND To gain insight into the factors that contribute to the more favorable prognosis associated with recurrence limited to bone in patients with breast carcinoma, the authors analyzed the number of sites of initial involvement identified on radionuclide bone scans in relation to long term outcome. METHODS Records of 641 patients with clinical Stage I–III breast carcinoma that originally was diagnosed in 1974–1985 were reviewed. During follow‐up, 295 patients (46%) experienced distant recurrence, includi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
20
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study showed that compared with patients with visceral metastases with or without bone metastases, patients with bone‐only metastases at start of first‐line therapy had an improved median OS (54 months vs 28 months) 29. Other studies also found that the median survival of patients with bone‐only metastases was approximately twofold to threefold that of patients with additional visceral metastases 30, 41, 42, 43. The results of our cohort study reached the same conclusion that patients with metastases to the bone only had better survival than those with metastases to both the bone and extraosseous sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study showed that compared with patients with visceral metastases with or without bone metastases, patients with bone‐only metastases at start of first‐line therapy had an improved median OS (54 months vs 28 months) 29. Other studies also found that the median survival of patients with bone‐only metastases was approximately twofold to threefold that of patients with additional visceral metastases 30, 41, 42, 43. The results of our cohort study reached the same conclusion that patients with metastases to the bone only had better survival than those with metastases to both the bone and extraosseous sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with a solitary hot spot on bone scan had significantly improved survival compared to patients with two or more hot spots. It has previously been reported that patients who have bone recurrence at initially only one or two sites on bone scan experience a survival advantage over those with more extensive skeletal metastases (Jacobson et al, 2001). Care needs to be taken when interpreting this finding, as a possible explanation for the apparent better outcome may be that a solitary hot spot on a bone scan has been incorrectly classified as malignant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovation in adjuvant therapy results in improved survival over time. The number of metastatic sites and the type of metastatic tumor load also affect survival [3][4][5][6][7]. Prior reports have shown that patients with metastatic spread limited to the skeleton have a relatively prolonged survival [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%