1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3835(99)00005-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic significance of tumor angiogenesis in epithelial ovarian cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
24
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies showed that MVD was not a useful prognostic factor in ovarian cancer (Obermair et al, 1999;Shen et al, 2000;Bamberger and Perrett, 2002). On the other hand, Hollingsworth et al (1995) reported that MVD was significantly correlated with poor prognosis of advanced stage ovarian cancer, while conversely it was associated with better prognosis (Ogawa et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous studies showed that MVD was not a useful prognostic factor in ovarian cancer (Obermair et al, 1999;Shen et al, 2000;Bamberger and Perrett, 2002). On the other hand, Hollingsworth et al (1995) reported that MVD was significantly correlated with poor prognosis of advanced stage ovarian cancer, while conversely it was associated with better prognosis (Ogawa et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These observations may be explained by the fact that higher tumor vascularity might permit better drug and oxygen availability, resulting in a therapeutic benefit, whereas tumor hypoxia leads to a poor response to chemotherapy (12). On the other hand, some investigators have found that MVD has no prognostic significance in ovarian cancer patients (13,14,23), possibly reflecting the hypothesis that new vessels formed in association with angiogenesis have structural and functional abnormalities with chaotic flow and intermittent stagnation, making it difficult to deliver drugs uniformly throughout the tumor (24). Thus, the role of angiogenesis in ovarian cancer prognosis and response to therapy remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 In ovarian carcinomas, several studies have shown that microvessel density is not an independent prognostic indicator. [42][43][44] Therefore, we did not measure microvessel density in the present study. Similarly, it has been shown that the apoptotic index is no independent prognostic indicator in ovarian carcinomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%