2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2004.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic validation of a 17-segment score derived from a 20-segment score for myocardial perfusion SPECT interpretation

Abstract: An algorithm for conversion of 20-segment perfusion scores to 17-segment scores has been developed that is highly concordant with expert visual analysis by the 17-segment model and provides nearly identical prognostic information. This conversion model may provide a mechanism for comparison of studies analyzed by the 17-segment system with previous studies analyzed by the 20-segment approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
156
0
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
156
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, comparable results will be obtained by the 17-segment model [15]. The non-improved group included patients with normal EF, and those with relatively high EF before revascularization might not show significant increase in EF after revascularization.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, comparable results will be obtained by the 17-segment model [15]. The non-improved group included patients with normal EF, and those with relatively high EF before revascularization might not show significant increase in EF after revascularization.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Myocardial segments were divided into 20 segments with QGS and QPS, namely six basal segments, six mid segments, six apical segments in the short-axis slices, and 2 apical segments in the mid vertical long-axis slice [14]. The 20-segment model was validated well and found to show good correlation with a 17-segment model [15]. Correspondence of coronary artery territory to segments was RCA to the apical inferior, mid and basal inferoseptal and inferior segments (5 segments); LCX to the apical, mid and basal anterolateral and inferolateral segments (6 segments); and LAD to the remaining segments covering anterior, septal and the apex (9 segments).…”
Section: Gated Spect Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPECT images were divided into 17 or 20 segments, and visual perfusion for 99m Tc-tetrofosmin uptake in individual segments was scored as follows: 0, normal; 1, mildly reduced; 2, moderately reduced; 3, severely reduced and 4, absent. 8 The scores from the 20-segment and 17-segment models were converted using the ratio of 17/20. 8 Summed stress (SSS) and rest (SRS) scores were calculated based on the stress and rest findings.…”
Section: Spect Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The scores from the 20-segment and 17-segment models were converted using the ratio of 17/20. 8 Summed stress (SSS) and rest (SRS) scores were calculated based on the stress and rest findings. The summed difference score (SDS) was defined as the difference between SSS and SRS.…”
Section: Spect Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual interpretation was performed using short-, vertical long-, and horizontal long-axis tomograms and a 17-segment model as previously described. 7 Perfusion in each segment was evaluated using a 5-point scoring system. In addition, the summed stress score (SSS), the summed rest score (SRS), and the summed difference score (SDS) were calculated.…”
Section: Tl Spect Imaging and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%