2015
DOI: 10.1515/jomb-2015-0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Value And Daily Trend Of Interleukin-6, Neutrophil CD64 Expression, C-Reactive Protein And Lipopolysaccharide-Binding Protein In Critically Ill Patients: Reliable Predictors Of Outcome Or Not?

Abstract: SummaryBackgroundSevere sepsis and/or trauma complicated by multiple organ dysfunction syndrome are the leading causes of death in critically ill patients. The aim of this prospective single-centre study was to assess the prognostic value and daily trend of interleukin-6 (IL-6), neutrophil CD64 expression, C-reactive protein (CRP) and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) regarding outcome in critically ill patients with severe trauma and/or severe sepsis. Outcome measure was hospital mortality.MethodsOne h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
26
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our present study, C-reactive protein levels showed statistically significant difference between survivors and nonsurvivors only on the 5 th day, which is, from the clinical point of view, rather late predictor of lethal outcome with AUC of 0.64. On the 1 st and 3 rd day, there were no statistically significant differences in C-reactive protein levels between survivors and nonsurvivors, which is in accordance with our previous study demonstrating AUC for this biomarker being <0.55, so C-reactive protein failed to predict lethal outcome in a similar patient population (27).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…In our present study, C-reactive protein levels showed statistically significant difference between survivors and nonsurvivors only on the 5 th day, which is, from the clinical point of view, rather late predictor of lethal outcome with AUC of 0.64. On the 1 st and 3 rd day, there were no statistically significant differences in C-reactive protein levels between survivors and nonsurvivors, which is in accordance with our previous study demonstrating AUC for this biomarker being <0.55, so C-reactive protein failed to predict lethal outcome in a similar patient population (27).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Since neutrophils are the first responders to both tissue damage and invading pathogens [8,9], multiple studies focused on neutrophils as potential biomarkers [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Biomarkers that were suggested after trauma included neutrophil C5aR expression [13,14], neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [17], neutrophil CD64 expression [18,19], neutrophil cell size [20], and neutrophil formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLF)-induced FcγRII expression, of which only the latter was found to be an early marker in multiple trauma cohorts [21,22]. Neutrophil fMLF-induced FcγRII expression measured immediately after trauma showed high sensitivity (90%) for the prediction of severe sepsis ≥ 5 days post-trauma [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dramatic expansion of the GR-1 + CD11b + cells in late sepsis was also documented in this study 17 . Predictive value of many components of immune response in sepsis, regarding disease severity and outcome, has been investigated; future large sample studies are required to explore MDSCs in this regard 29,30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%