Prognostic value of angiogenic markers in pregnancy with fetal growth restriction

Abstract

ObjectivePregnancies with fetal growth restriction are at increased risk of preeclampsia. Angiogenic markers including soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1 (sFlt‐1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) are altered in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction (FGR). The utility of these markers as a predictor of preeclampsia in women with growth‐restricted fetuses is still uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of angiogenic markers for predicting the development of preeclampsia in pregnancies with FGR and suspected preeclampsia.MethodsThis study included 93 women with FGR, defined according to Delphi consensus criteria, who were assessed for angiogenic markers sFlt‐1 and PlGF for suspicion of preeclampsia at the Department of Obstetrics and feto‐maternal Medicine at the Medical University of Vienna between 2013 and 2020. Women with established diagnosis of preeclampsia at sampling were excluded. Cox regression analysis and logistic regression were performed to demonstrate the association of angiogenic markers with the outcome.ResultsWithin this cohort, 14 women (15.1%) developed preeclampsia within one week from sampling, 21 (22.6%) within two weeks, 38 (40.9%) at any time. The sFLT‐1/PLGF ratio consistently showed a stronger association with development of preeclampsia compared to sFlt‐1 or PlGF alone in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction (PE within a week, AUC 0.85 vs 0.82 and 0.72, respectively). Models including sFlt‐1/PlGF were more strongly associated with preeclampsia hazard compared to sFlt‐1 and PlGF alone models (C‐index: 0.79±0.046 vs 0.76±0.048 and 0.75±0.047, respectively). Risk classification capabilities of sFlt‐1/PlGF decreased after the two‐week time point. The established cut‐off value for ruling out preeclampsia (sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio <38) was effective with a negative predictive value of 93.3% and sensitivity of 95.2%.ConclusionCombined use of sFlt‐1/PlGF can be preferred to PlGF alone in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction. Moreover, established cut‐offs for ruling‐out development of preeclampsia seem to be effective in these patients.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Re: Prognostic value of angiogenic markers in pregnancy with fetal growth restriction

“…I read with great interest the study of Palmrich et al 1 . Ninety-three pregnancies with fetal growth restriction (FGR), of which 38 developed pre-eclampsia (PE), were included in their study, which aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of angiogenic markers for predicting the development of PE in pregnancies with FGR and suspected PE.…”