2021
DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of BCL2 and TP53 genetic alterations for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with R-CHOP

Abstract: Objective: Limited data about the prognostic significance of BCL2 mutations and BCL2 copy number variations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are available. This study aimed to comprehensively describe BCL2 genetic alterations in DLBCL patients, and examine correlation of BCL2 , TP53 and other genetic alterations with outcomes in patients treated with R-CHOP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TP53 mutations can be found in 9%-29% of DLBCL patients, which is an independent risk factors related to poor prognosis. [21][22][23][24] In this study, the incidence was as high as 54% (13/24), possibly due to the preference for relapsed and refractory subsets in patient selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…TP53 mutations can be found in 9%-29% of DLBCL patients, which is an independent risk factors related to poor prognosis. [21][22][23][24] In this study, the incidence was as high as 54% (13/24), possibly due to the preference for relapsed and refractory subsets in patient selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Conventional prognostic evaluation methods, such as the International Prognostic Index (IPI) score and 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG)-PET/CT scan are insufficient to elucidate the clinical diversity of DLBCL ( Zwezerijnen et al, 2021 ). In addition, BCL2 and TP53 mutations are considered prognostic indicators in DLBCL patients ( Qin et al, 2021 ). Nevertheless, the effectiveness of these identified molecular markers has been limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past decades, the ability of IPI, R-IPI and NCCN-IPI to identify a subgroup of patients with very dismal survival has been proved to be unsatisfactory. Gene expression profiling [29,30], prognostic biomarkers based on immunohistochemistry [31,32], mutational analyses [33][34][35] and novel molecular subtypes [36][37][38] have provided crucially predictive information in DLBCL, allowing for better individual risk prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%